AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Micheal Hernandez

AUTO119 · AUTO102 · AUTO103 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a strong automotive instructor and are willing to attend, listen, and do the work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExcellent Automotive InstructorClear and ThoroughHelpful in LabAttendance MattersNot an Easy Class
  • Students consistently praise Hernandez as , and highly knowledgeable.
  • The class is not effortless, but students feel the teaching quality makes the work worthwhile.
  • Attendance and attention matter because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Grades appear attainable with attention and participation, but reviews say the class is not easy and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The material is not easy, but and .

All difficulty evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Students and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every substantive review recommends him for , and strong automotive teaching.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but they suggest fair outcomes when students attend and listen.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The class requires attention, attendance, and a book, but reviews do not describe an overwhelming workload.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

94/100

Students describe him as , and one of the best instructors in the department.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and learning, but do not clearly prove whether grades focus more on exams or assignments.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe an and helps students learn practical automotive material.

Main concern

The class is not easy, and skipping or being tardy can hurt you.

What students said

“The imo.”
AUTO119
“Though his class is not easy, he does his best to teach his students everything they need to know.”
AUTO119
“ and dont forget your book!!”
AUTO102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The imo.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and effort expectations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

94/100

“he will clearly take time to explain your question until you fully understand the matter.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“I'll be taking all his classes he offers from now on.”

📚 Effort Required

60/100

“Though his class is not easy, he does his best to teach his students everything they need to know.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • his lectures will never make u sleepy.
  • and and thoroughly.
  • Very Good Instructor

Theme 2

🔧 About Lab and Help

  • .
  • always ready to answer all your question.
  • he will clearly take time to explain your question until you fully understand the matter.

Theme 3

📌 and Effort

  • make sure you listen!!
  • and dont forget your book!!
  • Though his class is not easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and specific about teaching quality and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTO1022 reviews
AUTO1192 reviews
AUTO1031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values