AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Ken Morgan

AUTOMOTIVE · AUTO141 · AUTO · AUTO102103 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
60/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you value subject knowledge and can tolerate dry, lecture-heavy instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProKnowledgeableLecture HeavyBoring ClassesLittle Hands-OnMixed Teaching Value
  • Students agree Ken Morgan knows automotive material well.
  • , and lacks hands-on learning.
  • The single online review is positive but too brief to outweigh the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Grades can be high for some students, but comments also describe tough passing conditions and .

The online review gives no grade-effort detail, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The material and lectures appear standard to challenging, especially when the class feels dry or hard to pass.

Online evidence is too brief, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

Neither online nor in-person reviews clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

, but the boring and low hands-on format creates real hesitation.

The online review is positive, while and more critical.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

+ but also comments that the class is tough to pass.

Format shift

, and in-person evidence is mixed.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in detail, but lecture-heavy classes and difficulty complaints suggest moderate effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He knows the subject, but repeated complaints about boring lectures and no hands-on work weaken the experience.

Format shift

but brief, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify exam-heavy or assignment-heavy assessment methods.

Format shift

Neither format provides enough detail to separate assessments by format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as knowledgeable but often boring, book-based, and short on hands-on work.

Main concern

Students may not get enough practical, hands-on automotive learning.

What students said

“No hands on whatsoever.”
AUTOMOTIVE
“tough class to pass.”
AUTO141
“only liked to read out of the book, no hands on.”
AUTO

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The one online review is positive but very brief, praising knowledge and stories.

Main concern

The evidence is too limited to judge online structure or workload clearly.

What students said

“Great knowledgeable, good stories”
AUTO102103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“he knows his stuff, class is very boring, lots of lectures that kinda/sorta relate to the course.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, practical learning, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Knows subject well. Interested in student success.”

⚙️ Practical Learning

35/100

“No hands on whatsoever.”

👍 Recommendation Value

66/100

“Great knowledgeable, good stories”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class is very boring
  • only liked to read out of the book, no hands on.
  • Great knowledgeable, good stories

Theme 2

🔧 About Hands-On Learning

  • No hands on whatsoever.
  • I learned more in one day on the job than I did in two years taking his classes.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • tough class to pass.
  • Knows subject well. Interested in student success.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only 6 reviews, most are very old, and .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1021032 reviews
AUTO1412 reviews
AUTO1 review
AUTOMOTIVE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values