AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Stephen Blades

PSYCH200 · PSY10 · PSYCH060 · PYSCH92 · PSYCHOLOGY · PSYC60 · PSYCH92 · PHYCH63 · PSYC001 · PSYCH · PYSCH1 · PSYCH60 · PSYCH1 · ENGL1A · PSYCH01 · PSY001 · PSYCH001 · PSYC99 · PSYCHOLOGY001 · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesRude behaviorPoor directionsOff-topic videosTough grader
  • Most students describe the class as , and poor for learning psychology.
  • Many comments report rude or , and inconsistent grading expectations.
  • A few students say , and following instructions, but the overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Some students passed or got good grades, but , and self-teaching make an A costly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material may not be inherently advanced, but the class becomes hard because , and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because one review says perfect attendance counted for 100 points.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly warn others away because , and ineffective.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many reviews describe tough, strange, unclear, or possible.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Homework may be limited in some sections, but reports of books, portfolios, reports, tests, notes, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

The dominant pattern is poor teaching, rude communication, off-topic lectures, late arrivals, and little useful psychology instruction.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Students mention homework, book reports, portfolios, tests, quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with repeated complaints about rudeness, disorganization, off-topic lectures, and poor learning value.

Main concern

Students frequently say he does not teach clearly and is rude when asked for help.

What students said

“He is not SPECIFIC at all in his directions.”
PSYCH001
“ ! .”
PSYCH060
“This teacher does not teach.”
PSYC99

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is inconsistent, with students mentioning tests, canceled midterms, quizzes, and finals but .

TestsQuizzesMidterm ExamsFinal ExamUnclear Exam Policies

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, but do not clearly prove the exam security or book policy.

TestsQuizzesMidterm ExamsFinal ExamUnclear Exam Policies
“He grades on book report, portfolio, HW, and test.”
PSYCH001
“ .”
PSYCH001
“im passing..just read tbe two books for the final!!”
PSYCH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please do yourself a favor & DO NOT SIGN UP FOR HIS COURSES.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“This teacher does not teach.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“Please do yourself a favor & DO NOT SIGN UP FOR HIS COURSES.”

⚖️

20/100

“Very knowledgeable instructor, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher does not teach.
  • Constantly off topic. Very poor communication skills.
  • He is not SPECIFIC at all in his directions.
  • Instruction is generally disorganized, topics are unrrelated, not connected to each other.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Classroom Experience

  • ! .
  • He is the ...he s so rude and mean.
  • He hardly shows for class and when he does he's 15 - 20 minutes late.
  • Not an enjoyable experience at all.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very knowledgeable instructor, but .
  • If you read the textbook and .
  • The only good part is that there is very little hw in the class.
  • Right now, everyone just wants a C to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 50 in-person reviews over many years repeat the same concerns with specific details.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 56
2 out of 515
1 out of 527

Course coverage

PSYCH00118 reviews
PSYCH925 reviews
PSYCH0604 reviews
PSYCH604 reviews
PSY0013 reviews
Show 14 more courses
PSYCH12 reviews
PSYCHOLOGY0012 reviews
ENGL1A1 review
PHYCH631 review
PSY101 review
PSYC0011 review
PSYC601 review
PSYC991 review
PSYCH1 review
PSYCH011 review
PSYCH2001 review
PSYCHOLOGY1 review
PYSCH11 review
PYSCH921 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1