AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Gloria Lujan

SOC011 · SOC10 · SOC010 · SOC011202 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you can learn from the textbook and tolerate a disorganized class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedOften lateBook-based testsMixed student reactionsHard tests for some
  • Reviews are sharply split, with older positive comments but several later reviews warning against taking her.
  • Negative reviews focus , and .
  • Students who read the textbook and participate can pass, but the classroom experience is inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

The class can be easy for textbook-driven students, but and limited grade-boosting keep it from being a low-effort A.

, and opinions conflict across years.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

63/100

Some students call the requirements straightforward and easy, but weak lecture organization makes the course harder for others.

Only in-person reviews exist, with mixed reports on course ease.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews suggest participation helps grades, but they do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation but do not prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Several students strongly warn against taking her because of disorganization, lateness, and difficult tests.

All and is heavily mixed but leans negative in later comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students report , and a need to perform well from the beginning.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The workload is not described as heavy, but students must read the textbook and participate to do well.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

The dominant negative , and poor alignment between class and tests.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Students repeatedly discuss tests and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

negative, with the most repeated concerns being disorganization, lateness, and textbook-driven tests.

Main concern

The main concern is that class time may not prepare students well for tests.

What students said

“She's ”
SOC011202
“Everything on the ”
SOC010
“Easy class and requirements are straightforward.”
SOC011202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe hard, textbook-based tests, but do .

Hard TestsTextbook-Based TestsParticipation Helps Grade

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and textbook-based, but they do not clearly prove exam security rules or book policy.

Hard TestsTextbook-Based TestsParticipation Helps Grade
“ ”
SOC011202
“Everything on the ”
SOC10
“YOu must read the text book to pass the tests.”
SOC010

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's , and no one ever knows what she's talking about Don't take her”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting the split between disorganization complaints and textbook-based success strategies. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Concerns

38/100

“She's ”

📘 Test Preparation

42/100

“Everything on the ”

👍 Positive Minority

34/100

“Easy class and requirements are straightforward.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is really boring
  • and doesnt ever know what shes doing
  • Professor is passionate and knowledgable.

Theme 2

📈

  • She gives ZERO room to boost your grade if needed.
  • If u want a good grade u must participate in the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

and give detailed but conflicting accounts, with more recent reviews trending negative.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

SOC0112023 reviews
SOC0102 reviews
SOC0111 review
SOC101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values