AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Anthony Santos

ACCTG030 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can teach yourself the material and do not need classroom support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoes Not TeachUnpreparedPoor ExplanationsUnpleasant ClassroomNot Recommended
  • Both reviews strongly criticize his ability to teach accounting concepts.
  • Students say class time is wasted on unrelated business talk or .
  • One student earned an A, but the comments still describe a bad learning experience.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One A appears in the data, but the comments suggest students must survive poor instruction rather .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Accounting may be learnable, but content alone should be.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty and teaching barriers.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and online reviews are absent.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students directly discourage taking him because they found him unprepared and ineffective at teaching.

The negative recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The reviews criticize , and one student reports an A despite a very negative experience.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention outcomes, and .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe workload volume, homework frequency, or assignment burden.

Format shift

No online evidence exists, and in-person comments focus on teaching quality rather than workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe him as unprepared, unpleasant, and unable to break down accounting concepts.

Format shift

All and is consistently negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments but do not clearly prove whether the .

Format shift

, and assessment structure is unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

unprepared, does not teach clearly, and is unpleasant to learn from.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“He does not teach anything but he takes class session to tell you about his own business.”
ACCTG030
“Has no idea how to actually teach.”
ACCTG030

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Whenever you ask about the result from your assignment, he said he is not a grader.”
ACCTG030

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Has no idea how to actually teach.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Has no idea how to actually teach.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

8/100

“ as a "professor."”

📉 Classroom Value

20/100

“Taking him as the professor seems like wasting money and time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not teach anything but he takes class session to tell you about his own business.
  • Has no idea how to actually teach.
  • he has no clue how to break it down and teach it to the student.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • Taking him as the professor seems like wasting money and time.
  • He was unprepared, cranky, and just unpleasant to be around.
  • as a "professor."

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are detailed and consistently negative about teaching.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG0302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1