AI Rate Professor

English

Deborah De La Rosa

ENGL102 · ENGLSAM · ENG104 · ENG102 · ENG321 · 330AND321 · ENGL322 · ENGLISH · ENGLISH322 · ENGLISH102 · ENGL104 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want a supportive English professor and can keep up with and writing.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpfulEasy if you do the workLots of readingKind and personableSometimes boring
  • Most students describe her English classes as easy and manageable if assignments and .
  • She is repeatedly seen as helpful, kind, flexible, and enjoyable despite some boring lectures.
  • The main cost is time from reading and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A appears very realistic if students complete the , and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The work is repeatedly called easy, though reading and .

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

Reviews mention being on time as helpful but do not prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes the class manageable.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students say she does not grade too hard and rewards completed work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Assignments are easy but several reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students call her helpful, caring, personable, and enjoyable, with some complaints about boring lectures.

Format shift

Teaching evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly , and manageable expectations.

Main concern

Some students found lectures boring and the .

What students said

“Class was real easy. and read.”
ENGLISH322
“She is very personable, flexible and well liked by all in the class.”
ENGL322
“Easy teacher if you do all the work.”
ENGL102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy teacher if you do all the work. She gives out a lot of reading and writing assignments.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“She is very personable, flexible and well liked by all in the class.”

📈 Easy With Effort

86/100

“do all the assignments and reading and you'll be fine!”

⚖️ Workload Reality

58/100

“The work is really easy, but it's time consuming.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very personable, flexible and well liked by all in the class.
  • She was a very good teacher!
  • and humble.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of reading required.
  • do all the assignments and reading and you'll be fine!
  • She gives out a lot of reading and writing assignments.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • doesn't grade to hard
  • if you do all the work then it's easy
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews give consistent themes, but most are old and many lack detailed grade or assessment information.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1023 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
330AND3211 review
ENG1041 review
ENG3211 review
Show 6 more courses
ENGL1041 review
ENGL3221 review
ENGLISH1 review
ENGLISH1021 review
ENGLISH3221 review
ENGLSAM1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values