AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jingzi Zhou

MATH13 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can learn the material mostly on your own and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing ExplanationsHarsh With QuestionsStrong Content KnowledgeLanguage Barrier
  • Students report that Jingzi Zhou knows the material but .
  • Questions can become tense because one review .
  • The course feels difficult mainly because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Getting an A because the course is rated difficult and the .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The math content , and corrected mistakes in class.

Only in-person reviews exist, and both describe the course as difficult to follow.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most comments are negative because and poor responses to questions.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

No grades or grading policy are given, but high difficulty and low .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention low class scores, with .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload is not directly described, but students say success depends on paying attention, asking questions, and doing the .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Students say she knows the material but teaches unclearly, reacts poorly to questions, and may make mistakes in class.

Format shift

, and they are consistently negative about teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe difficult math instruction with and weak classroom support.

Main concern

Students may struggle because and questions are not always welcomed.

What students said

“Her English skills are no the best but if you pay attention and ask questions/do your work you should be fine.”
MATH13
“Students often correct her work which makes understanding the if she is teaching correctly.”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the open-book or closed-book.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Students often correct her work which makes understanding the if she is teaching correctly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and classroom support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“This teacher knows the material well, but her teaching skills still need work.”

⚠️ Classroom Support

20/100

“She gets mad if you ask questions and don't and will snap at you.”

📈 Difficulty

32/100

“Her English skills are no the best but if you pay attention and ask questions/do your work you should be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This teacher knows the material well, but her teaching skills still need work.
  • Students often correct her work which makes understanding the if she is teaching correctly.

Theme 2

🙋 About Helpfulness

  • She gets mad if you ask questions and don't and will snap at you.
  • If the entire class scores low, she will blame the class and textbook, not her teaching

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they are detailed but too few for strong confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH132 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values