Linda Flournoy

ENGACCE · ENG1 · ENGLISH · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 29/100
RMP rating: 2.2/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and accept high grading uncertainty.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared lecturesHarsh final gradingHelpful but riskyPoor transparency

Reviews are split, but the strongest negative comment says class preparation and instruction are very weak.
One positive review describes her as knowledgeable, understanding, gracious, and very helpful.
because students may not know their grade until the end.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks difficult because and little grade visibility.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The English content itself is not described as complex, but poor preparation and .

Only in-person reviews discuss course difficulty, and they focus more on instruction than content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is low because the most detailed negative review warns students to leave, despite one strongly positive review.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

A and gives little warning before the final grade appears.

Format shift

, and the clearest grading evidence is negative.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews , but unclear teaching may increase the practical workload.

Format shift

, and there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

her knowledgeable and helpful while another says she is unprepared and irrelevant.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person, and the comments conflict strongly.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention final grades but do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

mix, and no online evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews describe a high-risk English class with unclear teaching and and knowledgeable.

Main concern

Students may face weak preparation, unclear grade tracking, and .

What students said

“The WORST english teacher ever.”
ENG1

“She has NO mercy whatsoever when .”
ENGLISH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the rules.

Exam policy unclearFinal grade risk

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but one review highlights harsh final grade outcomes.

Exam policy unclearFinal grade risk

“You have no clue as to what you have until the day that the report cards come out”
ENGLISH

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She has NO mercy whatsoever when .”
Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She NEVER goes over anything pertaining to the english language and doesn't prepare for her classes in the slightest.”

⚖️

18/100

“She has NO mercy whatsoever when .”

👍 Mixed Helpfulness

32/100

“ though!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She NEVER goes over anything pertaining to the english language and doesn't prepare for her classes in the slightest.
Mrs.Fluornoy is a great and extremely knowledgable teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

She has NO mercy whatsoever when .
You have no clue as to what you have until the day that the report cards come out

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 old reviews are available, and they are highly inconsistent in tone.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG11 review

ENGACCE1 review

ENGLISH1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

B 1

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Linda Flournoy

Avoid unless x x x x x and accept high grading uncertainty.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Varies

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

👍 Mixed Helpfulness

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Grades

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid unless and accept high grading uncertainty.

⚖️