AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Maaza Mekuria

ENG10 · ENGR10 · ENGR010 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

unless you are comfortable learning engineering material mostly on your own.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesDisorganized teachingUnhelpful testsTime-consuming projectSelf-teaching required
  • Students consistently say the professor is kind or entertaining but ineffective at teaching engineering material.
  • Several reviews say lectures did not prepare students for .
  • The course feels hard mainly because students must teach themselves and receive little usable guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report , and a .

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The material becomes challenging because , and students must self-teach.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

because only in-person reviews exist and they do not address it.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

because they found the and unhelpful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

, and test problems reportedly did not match what was taught.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The project is described as taking a lot of time, and students needed outside resources to survive the class.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Students repeatedly describe lectures as , and ineffective.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Comments mention tests, textbook and MATLAB reliance, and a major robot project.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with , and weak support.

Main concern

Students say they had to learn through trial and error because lectures and help were ineffective.

What students said

“Lectures did not help at all, he was often flustered teaching us what he meant.”
ENGR010
“ what he taught.”
ENG10
“he doenst slow down and if you dont get it, its your problem.”
ENG10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews mention tests that did not match instruction, but they do not .

Test problems not aligned with lecturesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests with poor alignment to lectures, but .

Test problems not aligned with lecturesReviews do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy
“ what he taught.”
ENG10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Lectures did not help at all, he was often flustered teaching us what he meant.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting key themes in , and self-teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Lectures did not help at all, he was often flustered teaching us what he meant.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

10/100

“ .. he know what hes doing but he has absolutely no knowledge on how to teach it..”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

28/100

“Without it, one shall fail.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Extremely disorganize with his teaching.
  • he has absolutely no knowledge on how to teach it..

Theme 2

📚

  • what he taught.
  • The and I didn't think it added much value to my engineering education.
  • You need the book and matlab. Without it, one shall fail.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because and detailed, though the sample is still small.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG103 reviews
ENGR0101 review
ENGR101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values