AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chokri Sendi

MATH11A · MATH61 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if , because students say you must teach yourself much of the course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNice PersonalityPoor ExplanationsSelf-Taught CourseVery Difficult MathAvoid For Learning Support
  • Students describe Sendi as kind and friendly but weak at explaining math concepts.
  • Both reviews say the class feels self-taught and difficult for students who need instruction.
  • The small sample is consistent but limited, so confidence is low to medium.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The class appears hard to earn an A in because students report and a need to learn material independently.

All evidence comes from two in-person math reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The content feels difficult because concepts and .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students like his personality but because the course feels self-taught.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

There is , but the very high difficulty and poor instructional support suggest grades require substantial independent effort.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students must figure out concepts and despite limited detail on assignments.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

25/100

Both reviews say he is friendly but ineffective at explaining content and problems.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

and problem solving but do not clearly prove whether exams or .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but a confusing and largely self-taught math class.

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“He did not know the content of the class and .”
MATH61
“It's more like self-thought class.”
MATH11A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, book .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It's more like self-thought class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“He did not know the content of the class and .”

📈 Difficulty And Effort

28/100

“Would constantly get himself caught in math loops and then tell the class to figure it out at home.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

22/100

“If you are not into math and want .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Unfortunately though Mr. Sendi is a teacher.
  • and funny.
  • He could not explain how to do the .

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Burden

  • Would constantly get himself caught in math loops and then tell the class to figure it out at home.
  • It's more like self-thought class.
  • If you are not into math and want .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, though they strongly agree on the main teaching problem.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11A1 review
MATH611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values