AI Rate Professor

Accounting

. Botsford

ACCTG20 · ACCOUNTING20 · ACCT202 · ACCT021 · ACCTG021 · ACCT20 · ACOUNTG20 · ACCT097 · ACCOUTING · ACCTGACCT · ACCOUNTING21 · ACCT020 · ACCT21 · MANAGERIALACTG · ACTG021 · 25 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want an engaging accounting class with grade support, but be ready for and occasional inconsistency.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit HeavyHard TestsEngaging TeacherOpen Book AssessmentsMixed Consistency
  • Most students praise her energy, helpfulness, and ability to make accounting more interesting.
  • Grades are helped , and some open-book or .
  • The main risk is hard and sometimes inconsistent exams, especially in ACCT21.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

, and some easy-A comments help grades, but hard tests keep it from being effortless.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting and tax content are repeatedly described as hard, even though .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

, but several comments say lectures help and one says an easy A .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her for engaging teaching and grade support, though a minority and moodiness.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and easy-grading comments make grading fairly lenient despite hard tests.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is manageable for many students because homework is often in class or uncollected, but .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Most , and caring, though some complain she is moody or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe an energetic and often helpful teacher with and .

Main concern

Several students say exams are very hard or inconsistent.

What students said

“She gives a lot of extra credits.”
ACCTG20
“ !!”
ACCT21
“Notes can be used on the final and also one of the !!”
ACCTG20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy is often student-friendly because some quizzes, midterms, and , but several students still call the .

Open Book QuizzesOpen Book Midterm And FinalTake-Home FinalHard TestsCurves

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention open-book quizzes, open-book midterms and , and .

Open Book QuizzesOpen Book Midterm And FinalTake-Home FinalHard TestsCurves
“her mid-term and .”
ACCT20
“Some of and open friends so no need to worry.”
ACCOUNTING21
“one of the !!”
ACCTG20
“Majority of da class failed her 1st exam n she had 2 curve big time.”
ACCT021

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If , if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“ .”

📈 Grade Support

74/100

“Lots of which is great because I have more than a 100% on my grade.”

⚠️

42/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • she makes the class really interesting
  • very helpful and full of life.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • She gives a lot of extra credits.
  • Hard class!! I had to get a tutor but I'm getting it.
  • but you learn a lot!!

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • her mid-term and .
  • Some of and open friends so no need to worry.
  • !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

25

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 25 in-person reviews span multiple courses and years with repeated themes, though the data is old.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCT205 reviews
ACCT214 reviews
ACCT0212 reviews
ACCT0972 reviews
ACCTG202 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ACCOUNTING201 review
ACCOUNTING211 review
ACCOUTING1 review
ACCT0201 review
ACCT2021 review
ACCTG0211 review
ACCTGACCT1 review
ACOUNTG201 review
ACTG0211 review
MANAGERIALACTG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values