AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ajai Cribbs

MATH013 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a , but expect real effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsFair gradingPositive attitudeRecommended
  • Students describe her as , and respectful.
  • The only review suggests solid teaching but limited evidence.
  • The course may .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

The , but the difficulty rating suggests students should expect meaningful effort for an A.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The class appears understandable with , but math difficulty is not described as easy.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Recommended because , and grades fairly.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students explicitly describe her grading as .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The review does not describe workload, so the safest reading is moderate effort.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

The , and fairness.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single in-person review is strongly positive about teaching clarity and fairness.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one old review.

What students said

“ and has a good attitude towards students.”
MATH013
“Grades fairly and .”
MATH013

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms.Cribbs is a good teacher. and has a good attitude towards students.Grades fairly and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and has a good attitude towards students.”

⚖️

62/100

“Grades fairly and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and has a good attitude towards students.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • Grades fairly and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review with limited detail.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH0131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values