AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carroll Bruce

INALG202 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to learn independently, because the only available student voice is strongly negative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot RecommendedBoring ClassLow LearningHard CourseNegative Experience
  • The only review is strongly negative and .
  • The student says the class was boring and they did not learn anything.
  • The difficulty rating is high, but evidence is based on just one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

There is no direct grade evidence, but the high difficulty rating and negative learning experience suggest getting an A .

The only evidence comes from one in-person review, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course appears difficult because the only student found it boring, unhelpful, and rated it high difficulty.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

review, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The only review because the student did not learn anything.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

, but the high difficulty rating gives no evidence of leniency.

Format shift

The .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Workload is not described, but the high difficulty rating and poor learning experience suggest a heavy effective burden.

Format shift

Workload evidence is weak and comes from one in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

The only student says the class was boring and they did not learn anything.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review .

Format shift

No format-specific assessment evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is strongly negative, citing boredom, poor learning, and .

Main concern

The only student report says they did not learn anything.

What students said

“ .”
INALG202
“Boring and I did not learn anything!”
INALG202

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“no. . Boring and I did not learn anything!”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the limited but strongly negative teaching and recommendation signals. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Recommendation Risk

15/100

“ .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Boring and I did not learn anything!”

📉 Course Experience

28/100

“no.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Boring and I did not learn anything!
  • no.

Theme 2

👍 About Recommendation

  • .
  • no. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the negative signal is important but not broadly validated.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

INALG2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values