AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Fayez El Giheny

ACCT20 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can handle a very harsh classroom tone and have no better option.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerCombative toneVerbally harshGender bias concernVery difficultNegative classroom climate
  • The only review describes a hostile and verbally abusive classroom experience.
  • Difficulty is rated very high, but there is no .
  • All evidence , so confidence is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

The only review gives maximum difficulty and describes a hostile experience, with no evidence of .

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course appears very difficult based on the only review's maximum difficulty rating, though the comment gives little detail on content.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

review, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only student response is negative because it describes combative behavior and verbal abuse.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

The difficulty rating is maximum and the review describes a harsh environment, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The review rates difficulty as very high, but it does not clearly describe specific workload demands.

Format shift

evidence.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

The review describes combative behavior, negative reinforcement, and verbal abuse.

Format shift

Teaching-quality evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not mention .

Format shift

Assessment evidence is not clearly provided in the in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The as combative, biased, and verbally abusive.

Main concern

The main concern is a harsh and negative classroom climate.

What students said

“Combative, self important, employs negative reinforcement”
ACCT20
“good professor if you want verbal abuse for the length of the class.”
ACCT20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove the structure.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or test format.

Exam policy unclear

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good professor if you want verbal abuse for the length of the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in classroom climate and fairness concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Climate

30/100

“Combative, self important, employs negative reinforcement”

👍 Recommendation Level

20/100

“good professor if you want verbal abuse for the length of the class.”

📈 Difficulty Signal

18/100

“Not good.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Climate

  • Combative, self important, employs negative reinforcement
  • good professor if you want verbal abuse for the length of the class.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Fairness Concerns

  • Flirts with the ladies and puts down the guys.
  • Not good.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the negative signal is serious but weakly evidenced.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values