AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Fayez El Giheny

ACCT021 · ACCT2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless there is no alternative and you can handle a very difficult, poorly taught class.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVerbally AbusiveIncoherent TeachingExtremely DifficultUnprofessional ConductAvoid Strongly
  • Both reviews describe severe problems with teaching clarity and classroom conduct.
  • Students say the class is very difficult and not focused on learning.
  • The tone is overwhelmingly negative despite only two reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Both reviews rate difficulty at the maximum and give no evidence of .

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course experience appears very hard because lectures are described as incoherent and unfocused.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it describes extreme difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly warn against taking him because of abusive conduct and poor teaching.

All , and both are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Difficulty is rated very high and there is no evidence of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload is not described in detail, but maximum difficulty and poor teaching likely make the course feel heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload evidence is indirect.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Both students describe the teaching as abusive, incoherent, and not focused on learning.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

abusive conduct, rambling lectures, and little useful teaching.

Main concern

Students report unprofessional behavior and incoherent instruction.

What students said

“Just RUN!!! Don't get burned by this professor.”
ACCT2
“he hasn't very much time to teach.”
ACCT021

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

No Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or formats.

No Clear Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just RUN!!! Don't get burned by this professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and classroom conduct. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“His teaching is a nervous, twitchy all over the subject almost incoherent rambling of loosely strung together thoughts.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Should not be allowed anywhere near someone who wants to learn anything.”

⚠️ Classroom Conduct

5/100

“Verbally abusive, arrogant, and a good professor only if you enjoy a dose of abuse every class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he hasn't very much time to teach.
  • His teaching is a nervous, twitchy all over the subject almost incoherent rambling of loosely strung together thoughts.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Conduct

  • Flirts with the ladies and puts down the men.
  • Verbally abusive, arrogant, and a good professor only if you enjoy a dose of abuse every class.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Just RUN!!! Don't get burned by this professor.
  • Just the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are detailed and strongly consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCT0211 review
ACCT21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values