AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Mark Carey

AUTO109 · AUTO102 · AUTO107 · AUTO · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
91/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

A strong choice for automotive technology students who want helpful, hands-on teaching with manageable work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHands-on teachingHelpful instructorClear reviews before testsFun auto classes
  • Most reviews strongly praise his hands-on teaching style.
  • Students describe homework as easy and test preparation as helpful.
  • One negative review reports a serious concern, but it is outweighed by several detailed positive reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

as easy and , but students still need to read and complete the work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The content sounds manageable because , and usually rated low difficulty.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

There is no online evidence, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students mostly recommend him because , and prepares students for tests.

The strong recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Low difficulty ratings and easy homework suggest lenient course demands, though .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Homework is described as easy and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and hands-on, despite one sharply negative review.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, suggesting a mix of assignments and exams.

Format shift

and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews mostly describe helpful, clear, hands-on classes with and .

Main concern

One review alleges discrimination and poor help, creating a small but serious caution.

What students said

“ . .”
AUTO107
“Great teacher and his teaching style is mainly hands on which is a big plus.”
AUTO102
“helpless teacher, discrimination”
AUTO109

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students mention tests and helpful review sessions, but reviews .

Reviews Before TestsExams MentionedPolicy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the exam format or rules.

Reviews Before TestsExams Mentioned
“ .”
AUTO107
“ .”
AUTO102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Can't ask for a better teacher. Knows what he is teaching... Fun classes. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Great teacher and his teaching style is mainly hands on which is a big plus.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“Can't ask for a better teacher. Knows what he is teaching... Fun classes. .”

📘 Workload Fit

80/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher and his teaching style is mainly hands on which is a big plus.
  • as well!
  • Very much Hands On.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • The class is of average difficulty, and .
  • Read the book and do the HW!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • helpless teacher, discrimination

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because five reviews show a consistent positive pattern, but they are old and one review conflicts sharply.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTO1022 reviews
AUTO1 review
AUTO1071 review
AUTO1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values