AI Rate Professor

Art History

Yael Karmi

ART091 · ART093 · ART90 · ART91 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you want a manageable art history class and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy if you take notesPowerPoints availableReading helps for an AAttendance mattersSome boring lectures
  • Most students describe the class as easy or straightforward if they attend and .
  • Getting an A may require reading and steady note-taking, even though some students did well without the textbook.
  • Teaching reactions are mixed, with helpful materials but some complaints that the class is boring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

An A looks very reachable with , and some reading, but it is not described as effortless.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content is mostly described as easy and straightforward, though lectures and .

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but students say showing up and taking notes is important for doing well.

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and a manageable class, despite some boredom.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students report doing fine with notes and one student earned a B without opening the .

Format shift

because there are no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes notes, reading for an A, a , and final, but students still call it manageable.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Her materials are accessible and she helps students, but some comments describe the class and teaching as boring.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears balanced across a , and lecture notes.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with accessible PowerPoints and some boring lectures.

Main concern

to get an A.

What students said

“Fairly easy, straight forward class.”
ART90
“This teacher was tough because it was hard to keep up with the lectures and there was alot of if u wanted to get an A”
ART091
“boring class, boring teacher.”
ART91

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final but do not clearly prove exam rules, book policy, or proctoring details.

MidtermFinalTerm PaperSmall Presentation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, but they do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or strictly proctored.

MidtermFinal
“There is a , and a final.”
ART90

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fairly easy, straight forward class. Sit and look a slides, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She will work with you for any problems. ”

📈 Grade Effort

78/100

“if u want an A, and read then you'll do fine”

🧾 Workload

62/100

“There is a , and a final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • She will work with you for any problems.
  • boring class, boring teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy class.
  • Fairly easy, straight forward class.
  • if u want an A, and read then you'll do fine

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Five older in-person reviews give consistent detail about workload and class style, but the sample is small and dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART902 reviews
ART0911 review
ART0931 review
ART911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values