AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

T Nguyen

PED017 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.5

The decision

Take this class if you plan to attend regularly and want a useful, low-pressure physical education course.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPractical TechniquesVery Few RequirementsHelpful InstructorStrict AttendancePhysical Workout
  • Students describe the class as useful, practical, and enjoyable.
  • The course is physically active but academically light with few requirements.
  • Attendance is strict, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting a strong grade appears easy if students attend regularly, learn the techniques, and complete the required essay.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

The content is practical and easy to follow, though students must remember precise technique names and movements.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person PED017 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as strict and important for students who enroll.

, and they describe it as strict.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

Students recommend the class because it is useful, enjoyable, and supported by a helpful instructor.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

because there are few requirements, but missing the .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

The workload is light academically, with few requirements and one noted essay, but the class is physically active.

Format shift

and show low academic workload.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Students describe him as helpful and able to teach practical techniques clearly.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

The only clearly mentioned assessment is a .

Format shift

but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and enjoyable martial arts class with few requirements but .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Very practical and useful techniques, and there's very few requirements.”
PED017
“He is , so don't sign up for the class unless you plan on attending regularly.”
PED017

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very practical and useful techniques, and there's very few requirements.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“He helps out quite often, but he can only do so much.”

📈 Easy Grade Path

82/100

“Very practical and useful techniques, and there's very few requirements.”

⚠️

15/100

“He is , so don't sign up for the class unless you plan on attending regularly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very practical and useful techniques, and there's very few requirements.
  • He helps out quite often, but he can only do so much.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I still think that this is easy
  • You do have to write an the class.

Theme 3

🧍

  • This class will really have you working up a sweat!
  • He is , so don't sign up for the class unless you plan on attending regularly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews are available, but both give specific and , and teaching style.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PED0172 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values