AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tim Carlson

MATH61 · MATH13 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you can handle inconsistent teaching and value a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityLaid BackLow StressCorrectable TestsOff Topic Lectures
  • Student experiences are and .
  • One review describes low stress grading with .
  • Another review says lectures go off topic and make learning very hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

forgiving, but one review reports severe learning difficulty.

, and the grade experience differs sharply between MATH13 and MATH61.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course can feel low stress in one class but very hard to learn in another due to off-topic teaching.

In-person evidence is conflicting, with MATH13 sounding easy and MATH61 sounding difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and neither clearly proves an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because one student highly recommends him while another strongly warns against taking him.

All recommendation evidence is in person and directly conflicts across two courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Allowing test corrections for , though evidence is limited to one review.

Format shift

Only the in-person MATH13 review gives clear grading evidence.

Workload

Light

72/100

One review calls the class low stress, while the negative review focuses on poor learning rather than workload volume.

Format shift

In-person workload evidence is limited and mostly comes from MATH13.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with one review praising the class and another saying he goes off topic and is hard to learn from.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

The only and .

Format shift

but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with one student praising low stress and another saying learning was extremely hard.

Main concern

Teaching clarity may vary heavily by course or student experience.

What students said

“Extremely hard to learn anything in .”
MATH61
“Low stress. .”
MATH13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Test Corrections For Half CreditExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Test Corrections For Half CreditExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
MATH13

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Low stress. . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation split. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Always goes off topic and spends the whole class time on one problem.”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“ !”

⚖️

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Always goes off topic and spends the whole class time on one problem.
  • Extremely laid back instructor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Extremely hard to learn anything in .
  • Low stress. .

Theme 3

👍 About Recommendation

  • !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only , and they strongly conflict, limiting confidence in a stable pattern.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH131 review
MATH611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values