AI Rate Professor

English

Donna G. Accardo

ENG102 · ENG102ONLINE · ENG101 · ENGLI101 · 152 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
29.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless you are an English major ready for and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy paper loadUnorganized deadlinesNo Canvas gradesTough picky graderPassionate about literature
  • and multi-essay load that overwhelms many non-majors
  • A minority of motivated writers praise growth;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

As exist for strong writers, but picky grading, mystery grades until the end, and .

Both formats report harsh or ; and short-term overload.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Multiple books, reading logs, and and time load beyond typical GE English.

In-person and ; compressed online terms feel worse.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and critical because little is posted online and assignments change in class.

In-person is clearly mandatory; but still require constant check-ins.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent comments urge classmates to pick anyone else despite a minority of fans.

Negative tone dominates both formats; a few online summer successes and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Frequent tough-grader tags, nitpicky rewrites, delayed or missing grade posts, and inconsistent criteria.

Format shift

Online and ; a few note good feedback when conferences happen.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

Four books, journals, reading logs, and .

Format shift

Workload complaints are universal; short online terms make it nearly unmanageable.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Passion for literature and occasional strong mentoring , and stress.

Format shift

In-person draws more organization and personality complaints; and deadlines.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and discussions rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-centric; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person ENG , and frequent complaints about handwriting, chaos, and stress.

Main concern

No online grade book, shifting requirements, and .

What students said

“Just dont. Thats all u need to know. ”
ENG102
“She does not post anything online, so you have to copy down everything she writes on the board”
ENG101
“If you genuinely want to learn .”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online sections still pile books and , and weak feedback for many.

Main concern

, and short terms make the load unmanageable.

What students said

“she graded half of done with the course.”
ENG101
“she does not have any grading rubric, has unclear instructions, ”
ENG101
“Just do your work and you'll pass with an A online. No problems with and caring.”
ENGLI101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on stacked essays and occasional timed writing rather than proctored multi-choice exams.

Essay-heavy finalsTimed essaysReading-based papersLittle formal proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

- and paper-driven with little Canvas; finals often mean multiple long essays due late.

Multiple final essaysReading logsNo Canvas gradesHandwritten board notes
“We had 16 pages in a total 3 essays all due in the last week of class.”
ENG102
“She does not post anything online, so you have to copy down everything she writes on the board”
ENG101

Online

Online work is essays, research papers, discussions, and sometimes a .

Timed essay finalResearch paperWeekly discussionsUnclear due dates
“I had to do 2 essays, 1 timed essay (final), a 6-page research paper, and two discussions.”
ENG101
“ if they were three pages”
ENG102ONLINE

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just dont. Thats all u need to know. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, weighing heavy negative organization themes against a smaller growth-focused minority. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“The and inconsistent professionalism. Expectations were difficult to interpret.”

📚 Workload Overload

15/100

“We had 16 pages in a total 3 essays all due in the last week of class. ”

⚖️

22/100

“she does not have any grading rubric, has unclear instructions, ”

👍 For Serious Writers

70/100

“If you genuinely want to learn . She will walk you through how to better your writing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • passionate about literature

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You will not know ur grade till after the class finished
  • will ask you to rewrite if she does not like it

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • So many papers
  • read 4 books at the same time, and lots of essays

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

152

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with rich recent detail, strong consensus on workload and organization problems, and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 571
4 out of 517
3 out of 512
2 out of 515
1 out of 537

Course coverage

ENG10130 reviews
ENG10212 reviews
ENGLI1017 reviews
ENG102ONLINE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 3 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

14

B+ 2 · B 11 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4