AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Larry L. Andre

PSYCH66 · PSYCH1 · PHIL101 · HUMANITIES31 · PSYCH066 · PHIL001 · PHIL5 · PH1 · HUM31 · PHIL02 · PHIL06 · PSYCH101 · 147 lifetime ratings

AI rating
97/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a and critical-thinking mentor who helps you earn a strong grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorRewrites allowedWriting-heavy critical thinkingAlways availableLife-changing feedback
  • Students , and deep feedback on writing.
  • Courses build real critical thinking and .
  • Attendance is usually flexible and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

, and help along the way, though you still must complete writing work.

Both online and ; online critical-thinking sections are essay-only.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content is approachable and well explained, but writing volume and critical-thinking demands still require steady effort.

Online and ; PACE sections move faster.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Most students report and lectures or .

A minority of , but .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Nearly every review strongly recommends him for care, clarity, and lasting skill gains.

Recommendation is unanimous across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and willingness to meet make high grades attainable.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload centers on weekly writing and but manageable.

Format shift

Online critical-thinking classes emphasize essays; .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students , and support unmatched.

Format shift

Praise for teaching quality is consistent online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and progressive writing with few or no traditional exams.

Format shift

Multiple online .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews highlight engaging lectures, Saturday study groups, rewrites, and strong support for returning students.

Main concern

Lectures can be long and information-dense.

What students said

“Professor is , and allows rewrites.”
PSYCH101
“He's great the class is an easy A because the professor wants you to focus on learning rather the grade.”
PSYCH66
“He will correct your assignments before you submit and grade.”
PHIL001

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students call him accessible via Zoom and , and heavy writing support.

Main concern

Some online sections are writing-heavy with long lectures and many essays.

What students said

“The ENTIRE class was writing essays which he helps you with along the way.”
PSYCH066
“Quite literally like a grandfather, would 100% take again and recommend. .”
PSYCH101
“He's open to teaching style and even hosted plenty of zoom meetings to make sure everyone understand the material.”
PSYCH1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Most sections emphasize writing over high-stakes testing, with help, rewrites, and .

Essay-based assessmentRewrites allowedTake-home midterm reportedFew or no traditional finals

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and easy finals with strong instructor support.

Take-home midtermRewritesSupportive feedback
“ you find the answers and understand the material. The .”
PSYCH1

Online

Online critical-thinking .

No quizzes or final in some sectionsEssay-heavyZoom help available
“His critical thinking class had no quizzes, no test, no final - the ENTIRE class was writing essays which he helps you with along the way.”
PSYCH066

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The !!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“His lectures are amazing and so you get to improve your writing skills.”

❤️ Care and Access

95/100

“ .”

✍️ Writing Growth

90/100

“I'm a returning student over 40, and I just completed English 101 with an A thanks to Professor Andre.”

👍 Recommendation

98/100

“He is the best. Take his class. You will see why that is all that needs to be said.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are easy to relate to. At time they are like being in therapy.
  • Lectures are long and filled with a lot of information.
  • everyone to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the class is an easy A because the professor wants you to focus on learning rather the grade
  • and expects each assignment to be better than the one before.
  • All you have to do is try and you will pass with flying colors.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Quite literally like a grandfather
  • He encouraged me to stick with it .
  • He treats each one with dignity and respect.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

147

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning years show high consistency on care, writing support, and recommendation.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5121
4 out of 516
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH112 reviews
PSYCH668 reviews
PHIL0017 reviews
PSYCH0666 reviews
PSYCH1015 reviews
Show 7 more courses
HUM313 reviews
PH13 reviews
PHIL52 reviews
HUMANITIES311 review
PHIL021 review
PHIL061 review
PHIL1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

41

A+ 7 · A 34

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values