AI Rate Professor

Art amp Architecture

Lyndsay Phillips

ART111 · ART103 · ART101 · ART141 · FA19P · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
48%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will do the and can handle anti-AI rules and busy modules.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAI crackdownLong modulesCreative projectsEasy quizzesNat Geo fee complaints
  • Reviews and long reading-heavy modules.
  • She is very strict about AI and sometimes requires self-photos or subscriptions.
  • Many students still earn As if and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

As are common if and projects, but AI flags, vague analysis prompts, and long modules raise the cost.

Online stresses anti-AI friction; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Intro art history content is doable, but , and .

Online modules feel heavier; and creative.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

flags and several optional online reports.

Online is mixed; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

; fans love creativity while critics cite AI rules and workload.

In-person lean more positive; online is more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Quizzes are often easy, but analysis work can be picky and AI scrutiny is intense.

Format shift

and tricky quizzes; in-person is warmer.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly quizzes, long modules, discussions, and but steady load.

Format shift

Online modules and finals.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Passionate lectures and caring emails for some; boring long content and poor communication for others.

Format shift

Online reviews are more mixed; in-person often praise passion and care.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Mix of quizzes, projects, discussions, and occasional papers or museum-style finals.

Format shift

Online leans quiz and project heavy; and final.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and care, though a few call her rude or unfair on opinions.

Main concern

Some report vague prompts, required books, or harsh scoring on personal analysis.

What students said

“Y'all need too chill on her, she's so sweet and ”
ART101
“This class is really, really easy and Professor Philips actually cares about Art & teaching.”
ART103
“she is very strict with AI, so don't use it because she will know.”
ART111

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report long modules, frequent quizzes, AI paranoia, and mixed ease depending on effort.

Main concern

, and mandatory Nat Geo or AI-photo requirements.

What students said

“This is the only professor that's really heavy on "dont use AI, ill know" type sh.”
ART101
“Easy A!! The and short, with no time limit.”
ART111
“She makes you take a photo of yourself for every project because she's paranoid about AI.”
ART101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and creative projects more than strict proctored exams.

Open-note quizzesNo time limit quizzesCreative project finalFew traditional closed exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and creative finals such as recreating a painting.

Open note testsCreative final projectMidterm and final in some terms
“The but she gives A LOT of readings.”
ART101
“The ! and then recreate it in real life”
ART101

Online

Online quizzes are often untimed or easy if you read modules; projects and AI .

Untimed quizzesModule quizzesProject photos for AI checks
“The and short, with no time limit.”
ART111
“ and her lectures are great.”
ART101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the only professor that's really heavy on "dont use AI, ill know" type sh. The modules are way too long and very detailed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 25 reviews, balancing online AI and module complaints with creative-project praise. Credibility rating: Medium.

🤖 AI Strictness

40/100

“She makes you take a photo of yourself for every project because she's paranoid about AI.”

🎨 Creative Upside

80/100

“The ! You choose your favorite painting and then recreate it in real life by using objects and !”

📚 Module Load

45/100

“Some modules were too long, and the .”

👍 Easy A Path

70/100

“As long as you give some effort, you will get an A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were very interesting.
  • Overall very boring and long lectures about stuff from decades ago.
  • She is very passionate, dedicated and knowledgeable about art.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A!!
  • If ur not a critical thinker ... .
  • No walk in the park. Some things are intentionally vague.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Policies

  • don't use AI because she will know
  • Makes you buy a $12 National Geographic membership
  • required tutoring, so be ready for that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

25

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-five reviews with mixed eras and polarized tone support medium confidence, stronger for online patterns.

Inside 25 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 54
3 out of 53
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ART10111 reviews
ART1037 reviews
ART1115 reviews
Art1411 review
FA19P1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 6 · A 8

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2