AI Rate Professor

Agriculture Natl Resources

Savanah Senn

PS103 · 10222SP19P · PLNTSC726 · PLNTSC103 · PLNTSC711 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
73.68%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want applied plant science and can handle a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHands-on plant and soil labsHeavy reading and homeworkSupportive but sometimes bluntIndustry experience focusedGroup lab work
  • Students , and good for real plant and soil skills.
  • reading, pre-labs, lab reports, and .
  • Organization and tone are mixed, with some finding her passive-aggressive or unorganized while and clear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Several students say she is an easy grader with , but the assignment load and .

Online A+ reviews are very positive; in-person comments and reading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Labs and soil or plant content are interesting but frequently described as , and sometimes advanced without a prereq.

Online difficulty spans easy to brutal; in-person averages out as standard-to-challenging applied science.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

34/100

Most recent sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping hurts lab and participation success.

Both formats commonly .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and industry knowledge despite workload and organization complaints.

Online ; older in-person opinions are more mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Multiple students call her an easy grader with if work is completed and instructions are followed.

Format shift

, though a few in-person reviews still fear failing from dense expectations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Homework, reading, pre-labs, lab reports, and projects are repeatedly described as overloaded.

Format shift

Online and and assignment volume.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students value her plant and , and support, even when delivery feels blunt or .

Format shift

Online praise for support is very strong; and organization.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and exams rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

and group projects; online comments emphasize homework and reading.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students highlight fun labs, industry insight, and , while a minority call lectures unorganized or expect too much prior knowledge.

Main concern

Some students feel lost without prerequisites and warn about strict plagiarism checking.

What students said

“Soils was interesting with fun labs.”
PS103
“I felt lost and , but she is an ”
PLNTSC103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews range from highly supportive easy-A praise to warnings that the and homework.

Main concern

and assignment volume can overwhelm students juggling other hard classes.

What students said

“ , and a great instructor overall.”
PLNTSC103
“The amount of reading, notes, and .”
PLNTSC103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments mix straightforward quizzes and exams with detailed lab work; reviews do not clearly prove webcam proctoring.

Multiple choice and essaysLab reportsQuizzesReview sessionsGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays, with review sessions and substantial lab report grading.

Multiple choice and essaysLab reportsReview sessions
“ and and essays.”
PLNTSC711
“exams and if you honestly review the chapters and review sessions she goes over the .”
PS103

Online

Online comments focus more ; exams are not described in proctoring detail.

Heavy assignmentsPre-lab work
“Easy class, just .”
PLNTSC103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Senn was always there to answer questions or correct instructions, and wanted to see me succeed as a student!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, , and workload intensity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ , and approachable, making complex topics easier to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ and grow.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“The amount of reading, notes, and .”

🌱 Hands-on Value

80/100

“Soils was interesting with fun labs.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's willing to help you, she's not intimidating like most students think she is
  • I like the way that she teaches because it is easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is an
  • Quite an easy class if you work for .
  • expecting us to literally now everything

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Kind too!
  • She cares about the the students learning.
  • Very nice teacher.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews are useful and fairly detailed, but the sample is smaller and names or course contexts vary over time.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PLNTSC1039 reviews
PLNTSC7114 reviews
PS1034 reviews
10222SP19P1 review
PLNTSC7261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1