AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Theresa Johnson

MATH240 · STAT227 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH115 · MATH261 · MATH238 · MATH262 · MATH134 · MATH260 · 99 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
60.66%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if and lectures; she is not a free A and results vary by section.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyLots of HomeworkTest HeavyPolarizing Math TeacherPatient but Uneven
  • Students and confusing mistake-filled ones.
  • Heavy online homework and .
  • and attending lectures is the usual path to a solid grade.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many students earn As by finishing homework and , but Calc 2 and As.

Online comments more often call it an easy A; in-person evidence is mixed and exam-driven.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content is standard-to-hard college calculus with dense exams and lots of practice problems.

Both formats report calculus difficulty; online does not make the material easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, yet multiple reviews say skipping lectures tanks performance.

In-person reviews stress show-up value most; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About six in ; fans praise patience and clarity while critics urge last-resort only.

; online sample is small and also mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Partial credit and homework-aligned exams help some students, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

; in-person shows both partial credit praise and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Nearly every and multiple exams.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Students either call lectures clear and , and .

Format shift

Polarization is stronger in person; online critiques focus more on delivery and responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams often dominate grade weight while and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person is lecture-heavy calculus with lots of homework; students, but pacing and clarity complaints are common.

Main concern

, and inconsistent lecture quality or .

What students said

“YOURE LAZY - she is so nice and will answer all your questions patiently”
MATH262
“TAKE AS A LAST OPTION, Trust Me.”
MATH262
“the problems.”
MATH261

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and mixed teaching quality, though and an easier grade path.

Main concern

Sparse teaching feel, privacy or , and uneven engagement online.

What students said

“ .”
MATH238
“easy A for calc 1, but good luck in calc 2 after...”
MATH261
“DOESNT READ HER EMAILS. INVADES PRIVACY. DOESNT TEACH AT ALL.”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and often resemble homework or lecture examples, with difficulty varying by course.

Homework-Aligned ExamsMultiple Choice CommonNote Sheet SometimesPop QuizzesExam Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some allow notes or replace lowest exam with the final.

Exam HeavyHomework-Style QuestionsNote Sheet Allowed SometimesLowest Exam Replaceable
“Tests were really easy and some .”
MATH262
“she does replace the lowest score with .”
MATH262
“ and are nothing like the examples she does in class.”
MATH262

Online

Limited online evidence; and exams similar to class material.

No Proctoring MentionedClass-Similar Exams
“ .”
MATH238
“The if not the same from what was covered in class.”
MATH260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Calc 2 is tough but i passed with 99% with her bcuzz she never gives questions that are too crazy whatever is on her exams she has already taught in lecture or its a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person math courses, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Impossible to learn, she doesn't understand calculus herself. Often gets lost, panics, then asks students How would you start this problem”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“TAKE AS A LAST OPTION, Trust Me.”

📚

30/100

“There is about 15-20 questions of in between.”

⚖️ Grade Path

56/100

“Do the homework and you are going to get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The way and I learned the material easily.
  • most of
  • She's passive aggressive too.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • the problems.
  • .
  • no or curve tho hw 20% exams 60% final 20%

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • she is so nice and will answer all your questions patiently
  • Life Changing. Regained my love for math.
  • Really sweet professor, takes her time

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

99

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years with detailed conflicting experiences give a reliable polarized picture.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 536
4 out of 514
3 out of 513
2 out of 517
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH26212 reviews
MATH26111 reviews
MATH2606 reviews
MATH2385 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1153 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
MATH2403 reviews
MATH1342 reviews
STAT2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 4 · A 21 · A- 1

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2