AI Rate Professor

Art History

Max Del Bosque

ART501 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-manage online art work and accept harsh or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderSlow to respondHarsh feedbackUnclear due datesInconsistent effort
  • Online sections draw , and confusing instructions.
  • One older online review reports free 100s with , so effort-to-grade is unpredictable.
  • The single in-person review found a chill, extra-credit-friendly A despite missed classes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students report free 100s while others face tough, unexplained marks, so an A is possible but not dependable.

Online reviews split between free A and ; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Art content is not described as advanced, but confusing instructions and .

Online difficulty ratings run higher; the .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

; the in-person section required attendance.

Online is optional; the as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

and most comments warn against the class due to communication and .

Recommendation is weaker online; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

misses his expectations and little improvement feedback.

Format shift

Online students call grading harsh; the in-person student saw him as an .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Several report more discussion posts and projects than traditional classes, while one claims work was never really read.

Format shift

Online mentions lots of homework; .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students cite unhelpful replies, mid-semester disappearance, and .

Format shift

Online quality is mostly low; the in-person review was more positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and participation more than formal exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and posts rather than tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One student called it a pretty chill class with and an A and missed meetings.

Main concern

and frequent missed weekly classes.

What students said

“I had no idea what my grade would be all semester although I got an A so seems to be an !!”
201

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most students report marked down hard, and occasional professor absence.

Main concern

and week-long response delays.

What students said

“He was very bad at responding and when I did get a response it would take him a week after to message me back.”
ART501
“The guidelines are very loose and light but ; making it very difficult to achieve high scores.”
103
“If you are looking for an . If you want .”
103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and focus on projects and discussion boards instead.

Project basedDiscussion postsLittle exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and focuses on overall chill grading.

Extra credit
“he offered a few opportunities and I did well so overall a pretty chill class.”
201

Online

Online comments emphasize projects, discussion posts, and .

ProjectsDiscussion postsUnclear due dates
“he cares more about if you participate in if you actually understand the material.”
103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (7 online, 1 in , and inconsistent effort. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Reliability

36/100

“the prof disappeared midway through the semester and never told us that he was taking several weeks off”

📉 Recommendation

35/100

“I would discourage against this class.”

⚖️

32/100

“ and if it wasn't up to his expectations he would give a low grade.”

🎲 Effort Versus Grade

55/100

“You could tell they never read the work you did he just always gave it 100%.”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • responses were very unhelpful
  • back
  • and boards lock before you have a chance

Theme 2

📝

  • graded some of the

Theme 3

🎨 About Course Feel

  • Material is fine
  • Easy course
  • overall a pretty chill class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight recent reviews with , but and mixed free-A versus harsh-A stories lower certainty.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

1034 reviews
2012 reviews
ART5012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values