AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Theodora Jaime

MATH227 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid unless and early mandatory meetings.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderLots of homeworkTest heavyUnresponsiveStrict syllabus
  • , and little active teaching.
  • Mandatory early (around 6 am) meetings and .
  • A few older or and partial credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

and test-heavy tags dominate, so an A and strong test performance, not minimal effort.

Online reviews stress tough grading more; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students rate difficulty high and and dense weekly lessons.

Both formats call the class hard; online comments emphasize heavy workload more than pure concept difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Most reviews say attendance is mandatory, including early live meetings with little warning.

Online reviews repeatedly mention mandatory early Zoom or live sessions; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and recent comments strongly advise against her due to strictness and weak teaching.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and C-range grades are common despite heavy student effort.

Format shift

Online students emphasize harsh grading; .

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and test-heavy structure appear across most recent reviews.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work; online adds inflexible late-work rules.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students say she reads slides, communicates poorly, and offers little active teaching.

Format shift

Online experience is widely panned; a minority of and clear.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and homework that prepares for midterms and finals.

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; one .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

two students praise caring lectures and , while one reports poor communication and AI accusations in a 6:30 am class.

Main concern

Early class times and communication issues still appear in negative in-person reviews.

What students said

“Amazing professor. She cares so much about her students and if needed.”
MATH227
“A 6:30 am class is bad as it is, having a professor who has zero communication skills and also accuses students of using AI is worse”
MATH227
“She gave good lectures which were done on slideshows and .”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MATH227 reviews are mostly very negative: little teaching beyond slides, unresponsive communication, heavy work, and rigid no-late policy.

Main concern

Unresponsive instructor, mandatory early live sessions, and .

What students said

“Unnecessarily strict and work-heavy for how little active teaching there was. .”
MATH227
“Her teaching consists of .”
MATH227
“Does not let you turn in if you reach out to her about being ill and in the hospital.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; reviews do not clearly prove open-book or special proctoring tools.

Test heavyPop quizzesHomework-based tests

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

quizzes and partial credit noted once.

Test heavyPop quizzesPartial credit
“It's test-heavy but not very hard, as she does partial credit”
MATH227
“Participation matters, Lots of ”
MATH227

Online

and pop quizzes, with homework feeding exam content.

Test heavyPop quizzesHomework-aligned tests
“The and the tests would be questions from the homework.”
MATH227
“Lots of ”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unnecessarily strict and work-heavy for how little active teaching there was. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 MATH227 reviews, weighting recent online complaints against a smaller set of . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Her teaching consists of .”

🚫 Recommendation

28/100

“Unnecessarily strict and work-heavy for how little active teaching there was. .”

⚖️

22/100

“Does not let you turn in if you reach out to her about being ill and in the hospital.”

⏰

15/100

“ and have been moved to earlier (6 am) times with little to no warning.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her teaching consists of .
  • zero communication skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Unnecessarily strict and work-heavy
  • It's test-heavy but not very hard, as she does partial credit

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • The syllabus is the only reliable form of communication.
  • Thinks you always use AI LOL

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Nine recent MATH227 reviews give fair detail, but opinions split by format and year, lowering consistency.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH2279 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1