Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
58/100Many earn A/B with revisions and participation, but perfect scores are rare and .
Online stresses revisions without free A's; but some still call him a .
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
Many earn A/B with revisions and participation, but perfect scores are rare and x x x x.
Online stresses revisions without free A's; x x x x but some still call him a x x.
Is the course easy?
x x x x x x x x yet time-consuming, especially without strong Adobe skills.
x x x x x x; online may feel less instructional support.
Is attendance flexible?
Attendance is mixed—some say mandatory or important for x x x x x x x x grade factor.
Online participation and critiques matter; x x x x x x x.
Is this professor recommended?
great for motivated design students, polarizing for those needing structure.
Positive in-person mentees balance x x x x x.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
52/100
Often fair with revisions, but rarely free A's and x x x x x x x.
Format shift
Online revisions help; several online reviews still flag tough or x x.
Workload
Moderate
55/100
Multiple design projects with sketches, concepts, and revisions x x x x x.
Format shift
Both formats are project-heavy; class time is often lab work.
Teaching experience
Average
58/100
Friendly and x x x x x; others find demos vague, YouTube-heavy, or disorganized.
Format shift
x x x x x; online clarity complaints are more common.
Assessment method
FocusOnAssignments
18/100
Almost entirely project and portfolio based with critiques and revisions; no traditional exams.
Format shift
Same project focus online and in person.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly
x x x x x x x x—but some call him disorganized or too YouTube-reliant.
Main concern
x x x x and weak software instruction frustrate beginners who need structure.
What students said
“Meet with him during class for feedback, and he will set you up for success.”
“You tube teacher, very critical, x x x x x x x x”
“Disorganized, canvas/zoom illiterate professor who misrepresents basic information”
Remote format
Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online sections are manageable with revisions allowed, but critiques and x x x x x x.
Main concern
Vague pointers and taste-driven grades frustrate students who want objective software instruction.
What students said
“he never gives anyone a perfect score but he does allow revisions for better grades”
“x x x x x x x”
“x x x x x x x x x personal tastes”
Exam style
No traditional exams; x x x x x x, and optional resubmissions.
Assessment risk
StudentFriendly
88/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
x x x and x x x x x; reviews explicitly note no tests.
“No tests; its a project based class.”
“the end of the year mandatory portfolio in art 606 is actually really helpful”
x x x x x x x x and revision chances; no proctored exams mentioned.
“Also allows for resubmissions until the end of the year”
“As long as you participate and follow his suggestions and x x x x x”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“x x x x x x x x.”
“Amazing professor! He offers a lot of x x x x x and demonstrates a good amount of past student examples”
“x x x x!”
“He never gives anyone a perfect score but he does allow revisions for better grades”
“x x x so vague, and rarely showed any useful examples.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
25
Recent reviews read by the AI
24
Lifetime ratings
68/100
Evidence confidence
25 reviews with polarized opinions and moderate detail; enough signal for projects and x x but smaller sample.
Inside 25 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
23 reported outcomes
A+ 1 · A 14
B+ 2 · B 3
No reported values
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 3