AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

Marisa Diehl

AJ3 · CJ1 · AJ1 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her without hesitation for AJ or CJ intro courses if you want an .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious lecturesGenuinely caringExtra credit heavyClear and engagingMust-take AJ
  • Near-perfect quality scores and 100% would-take-again sentiment across reviews.
  • She makes Admin of Justice fun with , and lots of support.
  • Tests are straightforward if you attend, read, and use review materials and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Many A and A+ grades, , and straightforward tests make high marks reachable with normal study.

; in person tests stay close to lectures and reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

Material is intro justice content kept lively and .

Both formats call content easy to grasp when you follow modules or lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Several sections mark attendance mandatory or warn that skipping hurts, even though some report optional attendance.

; online hybrid still expects lecture participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

and superlative praise make her a .

Recommendation is strong in both formats despite fewer online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Clear criteria, review questions similar to tests, and .

Format shift

; in person highlights fair, straightforward tests.

Workload

Light

76/100

and discussion, not an overwhelming load.

Format shift

Online is modular weekly work; in person centers on lectures, discussions, and periodic tests.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students rave about humor, energy, clarity, passion, and real care for student understanding.

Format shift

Praise is consistent across formats with denser detail in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

and final dominate, with some group work online.

Format shift

Online uses weekly quizzes and a group presentation; in .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In person she is repeatedly called amazing, hilarious, and stick.

Main concern

Attendance and participation often matter for lectures and tests.

What students said

“she deserves more then 5 stars she needs 10! !”
AJ1
“She makes the concepts easy to understand and she's really funny.”
AJ1
“If you don't understand something she will go out of ”
AJ3

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online and hybrid students still report fun , and .

Main concern

Group presentation at the end and need to keep up with weekly modules.

What students said

“ if you refer to the module content and book.”
AJ3
“The answers to literally everything is always in the modules. She grades fast and ”
AJ3

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent but described as fair and closely tied to lectures or modules.

Chapter testsMidterm and finalWeekly quizzes onlineWebcam not requiredExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person tests follow lectures and review questions closely, with midterm and .

Test every 3 chaptersMidterm and finalReview questions similar to testsExtra credit
“she gives a test every 3 chapters a midterm and a . The you would fail.”
AJ1
“Her riview questions and .”
AJ1

Online

and book; webcam not required but lecture participation is encouraged.

Weekly quizzesModule-based answersWebcam not requiredGroup presentation
“Webcam not required but you should participate in lectures to make it more interesting.”
AJ3
“ if you refer to the module content and book.”
AJ3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she deserves more then 5 stars she needs 10! !”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting humor, care, and fair testing. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Her lectures are awesome! she makes you wanna participate. She makes the learning fun and she makes you actually wanna learn it.”

👍

96/100

“ !!!”

😄 Classroom Personality

93/100

“Very funny professor, lectures were fun and I learned a lot.”

🅰️ Grade Accessibility

86/100

“As long as you pay attention to the lectures and show up on test days you should get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really makes the topics interesting and easy to grasp.
  • she puts an outline of what you'll be doing in class.
  • Always there to help and is really funny so her lectures arent boring.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • and really cares for her students.
  • You can tell she honestly cares about her students and .
  • she is so chill and

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of .
  • The you would fail.
  • You get the grade you earn.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-one highly consistent positive reviews over years with detailed examples give high confidence despite only two online reviews.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AJ117 reviews
AJ33 reviews
CJ11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 5 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1