AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katrina Wono

MATH240 · MATH263 · MATH134 · STAT28 · MATH238 · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH275 · MATH270 · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
67.44%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will show up, do HW, and use her reviews; and thicker skin.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleDrop lowest examCheat sheets allowedLots of homeworkPearson/Wiley cost
  • Many students get As , and use study guides or cheat sheets.
  • lower-level classes feel fair and supportive; and lecture-copy complaints.
  • Homework platforms often cost about $60-70 and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many As with , and HW retries, but tough graders and .

Online more MC and paid platforms; in person more partial credit and cheat-sheet talk.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Lower courses feel manageable; linear algebra and higher classes are frequently called hard and lecture-dense.

Both formats report wide difficulty by course level.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and skipping hurts; only a few report optional.

Online and in .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

67/100

About two-thirds would and accent complaints.

In person has more polarized advanced-course reviews; online is mixed on cost and clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Drops, partial credit, and , but several call her a .

Format shift

person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly HW is common and sometimes multi-attempt; advanced sections report lots of homework and test weight.

Format shift

Online paid platforms add cost friction beyond time load.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

, and care; others say she copies notes, has a thick accent, or is passive aggressive.

Format shift

Positive care themes appear in both formats; clarity complaints are stronger in some in-person advanced classes.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and and drops as buffers; several courses are explicitly test heavy.

Format shift

Online often MC exams; in person more mixed formats and cheat sheets.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person she is often praised as , and drop-friendly, though some advanced classes feel strict, note-copy heavy, and .

Main concern

and uneven lecture quality in higher math.

What students said

“If you pay attention you will get an A.”
MATH270
“drops 3 low quizzes & 1 exam score... .”
MATH260
“Professor Wono is a very by the book teacher... Study on your own because .”
MATH275

Remote format

Online

15 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections can feel easy and caring when lectures align with quizzes, but , and .

Main concern

and uneven lecture clarity.

What students said

“She is amazing! The best and easiest professor I've ever had.”
MATH227
“makes you pay around $70 for a . .”
MATH134
“ , so if your grade depends on .”
MATH263

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

with cheat sheets, but can pack many chapters and feel strict.

Cheat sheetsStudy guidesDrop lowest examMultiple choice onlineMulti-chapter exams

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person tests often match study guides or notes; cheat sheets and .

Cheat sheetsStudy guides match testsDrop lowest examStrict minor-error deductions
“ she gives before each test and allows u to use them DURING the quiz.”
STAT28
“ .”
MATH270

Online

; partial credit is limited.

Multiple choice onlinePaid test platformDrop lowest exam
“ , so if your grade depends on .”
MATH263
“makes you pay around $70 for a .”
MATH134

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“show up and because it is a lot of info, but if you pay attention you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews (15 online, 28 in , and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“she explains everything clearly and ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

67/100

“one of the ”

⚖️

62/100

“ ... and three homework assignments”

📚 Workload Reality

48/100

“Her class consists of difficult homework, 4 exams and a final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her lectures were pretty straightforward and easy to understand
  • She just copies down her pre-written notes again for lecture
  • Prof.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy to get A
  • You will get an A if do your HW & be on time

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She really cares about her students
  • can be very passive aggressive at times
  • and partial credit and very kind

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

43 reviews spanning 2020-2026 with detailed grade and policy comments and consistent mixed themes.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 511
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH2639 reviews
MATH2709 reviews
MATH2278 reviews
MATH2404 reviews
MATH2754 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1343 reviews
MATH2383 reviews
STAT282 reviews
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

38 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 9 · A 13 · A- 1

B range

8

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 4