AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Amanda Olson

CD30 · CD002 · CD46 · CD42 · CDC30 · CD31 · CD38 · CHDEV42 · CD007 · CD11 · CD3109 · CD47 · CHDEV001 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if and will over-communicate on every assignment; recent online students often regret enrolling.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing graderHands-on activitiesHistorically easy ARecent tough feedbackAttendance matters
  • Older in-person cohorts often called her an .
  • and zero-heavy grading on lesson plans.
  • Experience depends heavily on term and format; current students should verify expectations early.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Historically many called it an easy A with , but recent students say one mistake can zero an assignment.

Online recent reviews are much harder on the A path; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Child ; complaints focus more on grading clarity than conceptual intensity.

Both formats treat content as manageable; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Multiple students say and missing class risks failing or losing the easy-grade path.

loose; recent listings often mark mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Overall take-again is about 30%, dragged down by recent online hostility despite many older fans.

; online recent voices strongly say do not take her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

Older reviews call her reasonable and easy; newer ones report arbitrary zeros and no partial credit.

Format shift

Online recent evidence is .

Workload

Light

62/100

Often few papers/projects and ; load spikes when lesson plans are high-stakes.

Format shift

Online CD007 complains of few assignments but tough ones; .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Split between knowledgeable caring mentor and .

Format shift

In-person older praise dominates volume; online recent quality scores are very low.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Observations, lesson plans, projects, and papers matter most; .

Format shift

; recent online centers graded lesson plans.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and caring industry knowledge, with a minority calling her boring or moody.

Main concern

Some find lectures monotone and .

What students said

“Show up pay attention and you will get an easy A. ”
CD42
“ and open note ! ... Easy A !”
CHDEV001
“ times and unclear in what she wants”
CD30

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and high stress on few high-stakes assignments.

Main concern

Sparse assignments graded all-or-nothing with .

What students said

“If you want an A in CD 7 do not take her, she is no help at all.”
CD007
“She gives a 0 on assignments if she doesn't agree with it.”
CD007
“She will give you a 0 for making one mistake, and will not give you any credit for what you did do.”
CD31

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam friendliness used to be high with open-book take-homes, but and less take-home testing.

Take-home quizzes historicallyOpen book open notesProjects and papersRecent fewer high-stakes assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Older in-person sections often used take-home or open-book quizzes, midterms, and finals with projects.

Take-home quizzesOpen book open notesGroup projectsFew papers
“ , and always open book and and final.”
CD30
“There was 3 take it home exams and 2 assignments. and open note !”
CHDEV001

Online

Recent online comments focus on tough assignment zeros rather than friendly exam formats; .

High-stakes lesson plansTough zerosUnclear rubrics
“She gives a 0 on assignments if she doesn't agree with it.”
CD007
“Someone on here said she marks of arbitrary points, that is 100% true.”
CD31

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (5 online, 27 in person), contrasting older easy-A praise with recent online frustration. Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

42/100

“She will give you a 0 for making one mistake, and will not give you any credit for what you did do.”

🌈 Historical Easy Path

70/100

“Show up pay attention and you will get an easy A. ”

👎 Current Recommendation

32/100

“If you want an A in CD 7 do not take her, she is no help at all.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are fun and she implements lots of hands-on activities
  • she can be moody at times and
  • Exceptional professor - vast knowledge of children

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A !
  • She gives a 0 on assignments if she doesn't agree with it
  • You can tell she really cares about her field

Theme 3

📝 About Assignments

  • only a so not a lot of work, but she is a
  • Two observations, one group presentation and
  • , but not collected

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-two reviews span many years with a , so consistency is moderate and recent online sample is small.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CD307 reviews
CD425 reviews
CD0073 reviews
CD383 reviews
CD473 reviews
Show 8 more courses
CD312 reviews
CD31092 reviews
CHDEV422 reviews
CD0021 review
CD111 review
CD461 review
CDC301 review
CHDEV0011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1