AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patricia Doelitzsch

CD34 · CD10 · CD3 · CD7 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want rigorous child-development training and ; otherwise choose another CD professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderLots of papersPolarizingBelittling feedbackCareer-driving if you endure
  • picky with rewrites and little guidance.
  • Workload , and DRDPs especially in CD34.
  • A minority say she is inspirational and career-shaping if you can handle toughness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong writers report tough paper marks, rewrites, and no easy path to an A.

Both online and ; neither format looks like an Easy A.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content and volume of observations, papers, and critiques make the course intellectually and practically demanding.

CD34 in person drives most of the heavy-challenge evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory and classes as lecture-heavy multi-hour sessions.

A , but the dominant pattern is mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Roughly half praise growth and care while half say run and belittling.

Online reviews are near-unanimously negative; in-person opinion splits hard.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags dominate; students report late dumps of low scores and .

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Comments list stacks of observations, DRDPs, anecdotals, role plays, and many papers.

Format shift

In-person CD34 carries the heaviest documented paper load.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

, and devoted; many describe rants, sarcasm, and .

Format shift

Positive teaching stories are almost all in person; online reviews are poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on papers, observations, and projects with occasional exams.

Format shift

Paper and observation load is clearest in in-person CD34 reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call her devoted and , and overloads papers.

Main concern

, and huge observation workloads.

What students said

“When you see her name attached to a class, don't walk, RUN!!!!!”
CD34
“She is among the few who will actually work with you out there, if .”
CD7
“I think of Professor Doelitzsch as the perfect role model.”
CD10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

grading with little learning value.

Main concern

and overall poor online experience.

What students said

“The .”
CD34
“ .”
CD7

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear secondary to papers; one review notes a .

Multiple choice plus written defensePaper-heavy assessmentGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person CD34 mentions one exam that is multiple choice then a written part defending answers, plus heavy papers.

Multiple choice examWritten defenseMany papers
“ part where you have to defend your answer!”
CD34

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“When you see her name attached to a class, don't walk, RUN!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting polarizing grading and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚖️

18/100

“She and gives little direction!”

📚 Workload Intensity

24/100

“10 observations, 10 DRDPs, 5 anecdotals, parent conference role play”

❤️ Devoted Mentor Side

70/100

“This teacher is truly devoted to her students. She believes in hard work.”

👎 Classroom Climate

25/100

“She belittles when asked question.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • unless you are a glutton for punishment

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She she rants
  • talk for 3 hours straight
  • teachers her class so everyone can understand

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • perfect role model
  • caring, kind, and wants you to succeed
  • unfair and unreasonable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews with polarized detail give a usable signal but a small sample and limited online evidence lower confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CD345 reviews
CD75 reviews
CD102 reviews
CD31 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 3