AI Rate Professor

Anthropology & Geo Sciences

Adrian Youhanna

GEOG17 · GEO202 · GEOG001 · GIS31 · GEOGRAPHY02 · GEOG647 · GEOGRAPHY1 · GEO0682 · GEO2 · GIS25 · GEO1 · GEOG1 · GEO15 · GEO001 · GEOGR0453 · METEMET · GEOG15 · METEO003 · GEOG002 · GEOG2 · 65 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
29.63%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you need GIS rigor and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderUnclear InstructionsSelf-Teach RequiredHarsh PoliciesPolarizing
  • Extremely strict grading with little flexibility or makeups across GIS and geography courses.
  • Many students report and having to teach themselves software and content.
  • A minority praise her if you want a rigorous learning experience and carefully follow every rule.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and picky deductions make an A rare unless you match her exact format every time.

Online reviews stress zero flexibility; a with hard work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

GIS , and busy work push difficulty well above a light survey course.

Online GIS is described as especially stressful; but still hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping tanks your chance to pass.

Both formats report mandatory attendance in many reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and recent unless you must learn GIS the hard way.

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative; in-person opinion is mixed but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; students lose points for formatting, word count, map style, and tiny errors.

Format shift

Online and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Long module videos, lots of , and weekly time sinks of 10+ hours are common.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strong in both formats, especially GIS25.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Many say she grades rather than teaches, with and boring lectures; a minority find her rigorous and caring.

Format shift

; older in-person reviews are more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

and , and projects all matter.

Format shift

Online leans assignment-heavy; and detailed written tests more often.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call her the , while a smaller group says the challenge is fair if you want real learning.

Main concern

Harsh, sometimes arbitrary grading and .

What students said

“You will answer a question correctly and she'll mark it incorrect because she doesn't like the way you answered it.”
GIS31
“She is the toughest grader I have experienced. and will not give you much help.”
GEO001
“She's tough in a good way. Like any college course, you have to earn your grade and work for it.”
GIS25

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections draw the harshest complaints: , and zero-tolerance grading on word count and formatting.

Main concern

You will largely teach yourself from old videos and ESRI materials while .

What students said

“ . You will basically be teaching yourself.”
GIS25
“She will fail you because you're a few words short in a word count, or for not copy/pasting the questions with your answers.”
GEO2
“I got the impression that she is there to grade, not teach.”
GEO15

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes track lectures and , and rarely allow makeups or second chances.

Lecture and book based testsPop quizzesDetailed written answersNo makeups

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

sheets in some older classes, and no dropped quizzes.

Pop quizzesUnclear testsDetailed written short answersCheat sheets sometimes allowed
“ and will not give you much help.”
GEO001
“If a pop-quiz or in-class assignments.”
GEO2
“She , and her notes and examples are spot on.”
GEOG1

Online

and book with and little flexibility.

Tests from lecture and bookStrict gradingNo makeups
“ .”
GEOG002
“No makeups in the class.”
GEO001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If . I'm currently taking her class and I am shocked by her grading policies.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting tough grading, self-teaching load, and . Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

18/100

“She will fail you because you're a few words short in a word count, or for not copy/pasting the questions with your answers.”

📚

32/100

“If you want to be in the position of teaching yourself everything, this is the class for you!”

👎 Low Recommendation

30/100

“ . You will basically be teaching yourself.”

🎯 Rigorous for Learners

55/100

“If you're actually interested in pursuing geography, or genuinely want to learn it, then she is a .”

Theme 1

📝

  • She is a .
  • she grades very harshly
  • no opportunities
  • No makeups in the class.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You will basically be teaching yourself.
  • and .
  • Lectures lack life.
  • .

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I have never worked so hard for a C in my life.
  • Overall, pretty easy class.
  • It's a challenging class and lets you explore many different fields.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

65

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews spanning many years with consistent tough-grader themes and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 510
3 out of 511
2 out of 55
1 out of 524

Course coverage

GIS2511 reviews
GEOG0016 reviews
GEO0014 reviews
GEO14 reviews
GEO153 reviews
Show 15 more courses
GEO23 reviews
GEOG0023 reviews
GIS313 reviews
GEOGRAPHY12 reviews
GEO06821 review
GEO2021 review
GEOG11 review
GEOG151 review
GEOG171 review
GEOG21 review
GEOG6471 review
GEOGR04531 review
GEOGRAPHY021 review
METEMET1 review
METEO0031 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 7 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 2 · B 8

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Not sure yet 4