AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Wendy Bass Keer

CD001 · CD1 · ECON238 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
90.91%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Take her online CD1 if you will read, write honestly without AI, and ; she will go far to help you pass.

Best fit · Effort For RewardAccessible outside classGives good feedbackCaringInspirationalNo textbook cost
  • Extremely hands-on online professor who meets nights/weekends and
  • and writing with strict anti-AI honesty expectations
  • and check-ins when students struggle

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many B/B+ grades; A is possible with , and , not a free ride.

Online grades dominate; students stress effort and writing quality.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

, and but time-intensive, not soft.

Online reviews consistently note lots of reading and homework.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and require participation/office-hour engagement.

; she reschedules meetings when students cannot attend set hours.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

About 91% would take again; students rave about care, availability, and organization despite workload.

Nearly ; a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

and second chances, but tough on AI/cheating and writing standards; .

Format shift

; one review calls her a .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of reading, discussions, papers, and .

Format shift

Workload comments are overwhelmingly from online CD1.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Funny, organized lectures, personal video replies, night/weekend meetings, and proactive outreach to struggling students.

Format shift

Modern online reviews are excellent; a few pre-2018 reviews rate teaching poorly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Discussions, papers, readings, and ; exams allow notes in at least one section.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and care; two older 2017 reviews call her unorganized with poor communication.

Main concern

and cite non-response to emails.

What students said

“Hard but fair. . Felt like she really cared if I learned or not.”
CD1
“ and has bad communication skills.”
CD1

Remote format

Online

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online CD1/CD001 is organized, no textbook, lots of reading and discussions, with unusually high professor presence and .

Main concern

Heavy workload, AI/cheating scrutiny, and .

What students said

“I have never had a professor give me a personal video.”
CD001
“don't use AI, she knows if you do and you will get caught.”
CD1
“Lots of work. I learned a lot. She grades your writing so remember to not use texting language.”
CD1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

At least one student reports notes on exams and ; no Lockdown Browser is mentioned.

Notes allowed on examsLibrary proctoring accommodationFeedback-driven extra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring tools.

Online

.g., library) and one review says notes allowed; AI use is strictly policed.

Notes on examsLibrary final optionAnti-AI integrity
“Definitely hard and a lot of reading, but you .”
CD1
“i had trouble with the final and she let me go to the library and .”
CD001
“don't use AI, she knows if you do and you will get caught.”
CD1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she inspired me to try harder”

Voice snapshots generated from 44 reviews (40 online, 4 in , and integrity rules. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Extreme Care

92/100

“I have never had a professor give me a personal video.”

🕒 Night and Weekend Access

90/100

“she met me at 6:00 pm to make sure i knew what i needed to do.”

📚 Heavy But

35/100

“This class acquires a lot of effort and .”

🚫 AI Integrity

70/100

“don't use AI, she knows if you do and you will get caught.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes really fun lectures with funny backgrounds
  • One of the .
  • The Instructor is well prepared and lectures are straightforward.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character and Support

  • she reached out to me to help me when I was struggling.
  • She met with me on a Sunday night.
  • she called me into a meeting and told me how proud she was of my work

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of work. I learned a lot.
  • the feedback area.
  • Beware, this teacher is paranoid of chatgbt and will fail you even if you didn't use it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

44

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-four reviews with 40 online and strong thematic consistency since 2020; older 2016-2017 negatives are outliers against recent detail-rich praise.

Inside 44 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 540
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CD131 reviews
CD00112 reviews
ECON2381 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

43 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 8

B range

23

B+ 8 · B 14 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1