AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

John F. Nantroup

AJ2 · CRIMINALJUSTIC · ADMJ · AJ24 · ADMJU3043 · ADMIN1 · AJ4 · ADMJUS2 · AJ102 · CJ · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a serious prosecutor-style CJ course and and long lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyChronically LatePolarizing ProsecutorTricky Exams
  • Recent online reviews , and political bias
  • Older in-person fans praise real-world CJ knowledge, humor, and career value
  • Lectures are long and exam-focused; missing class or deadlines is costly

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Many A grades appear, but , and harsh essay scoring mean an A still takes solid effort.

and drops; in-person students can earn As with careful lecture notes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard CJ material, but pace, dense lectures, and .

Online students call content easy but the professor hard; and tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple tags and comments say skipping lectures tanks your grade because tests come from what he says in class.

way; in-person lecture attendance is critical.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

, and recent reviews strongly warn against him despite older praise.

; older in-person fans still recommend him for CJ careers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and reports of harsh essays or biased scoring for opposing views dominate.

Format shift

and harsh marks are stronger than older in-person accounts.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Usually a few quizzes, tests, and lecture-driven .

Format shift

One online review cites lots of homework; , and .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Knowledgeable prosecutor with engaging stories for some, dry late lectures and poor support for others.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is rated poorly; and caring.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

, and lecture recall more than daily homework.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests and essays; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

his lectures and critics who call him late, dry, and confusing.

Main concern

Long dry lectures, frequent lateness, and .

What students said

“I've had several good professors at Pierce, but .”
AJ4
“always 30-60 mins late to class, only lectures, two quizzes,two tests no study guides FOR ANY TESTS!!!!”
ADMJUS2

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students , and little support.

Main concern

and opposing views may be graded down.

What students said

“ .”
ADMJ
“this professor is insufferable. Is a and may mark you down for having opposing views.”
AJ2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often described as tricky and lecture-based; .

Tricky ExamsLecture-Based QuestionsFew QuizzesExtra Credit OptionsNo Clear Proctoring Details

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and based on lectures; study guides are often missing.

Tricky TestsLecture Notes CriticalExtra CreditQuizzes and Final
“ and extremely hard, however if you study and keep good lecture notes, you will do fine.”
AJ2
“not an easy A”
AJ2

Online

Online comments focus on harsh assignment and .

Harsh Assignment GradingDeadline Drops
“ and not understanding.”
AJ2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've had several good professors at Pierce, but . He wants his students to leave with a better understanding of the criminal justice system.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews spanning online and and lectures. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

32/100

“Is a and may mark you down for having opposing views.”

📚 Lecture-Heavy Style

52/100

“His classes consist of long lectures, but the topics are super interesting and he's pretty funny.”

👎 Recommendation Split

34/100

“most boring class ever!! !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is perpetually late but for a good reason.
  • all he does is lecture and never gets to the point

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and extremely hard
  • not an easy A
  • Got an A in the class despite getting a 0 on an essay

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness and Bias

  • Biased political views unbecoming of an educator.
  • may mark you down for having opposing views
  • There's no understanding or leniency, just rigid enforcement of rules.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

29 detailed reviews from 2004-2025 with and consistent tough-grader themes raise credibility despite polarized tone.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

AJ213 reviews
AJ44 reviews
ADMJUS23 reviews
ADMJ2 reviews
30861 review
Show 6 more courses
ADMIN11 review
ADMJU30431 review
AJ1021 review
AJ241 review
CJ1 review
CRIMINALJUSTIC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1