AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Lila S. Snow

CD2CD42 · CD002 · CHDEV65 · CHILDDEV · CD0221 · CD · CD22 · CD11 · CHILDDEV2 · CD101 · CD02 · CD027 · CD2 · CD1 · CHD1 · CD01 · CD7 · 96 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
78.05%
Difficulty
2.1

The decision

CD class; approach recent online sections with caution because of AI policing and grade stress.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring second momAmazing lecturesParticipation mattersTough grader onlineNo textbook needed
  • In-person students overwhelmingly call her the best CD professor at Pierce for and real care.
  • Recent online sections draw harsh , and .
  • , and complete observations or discussions and most historically earn A or A+.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Historically many report an A from notes and participation, but recent online AI flags and .

In person looks Easy A if you show up; online reviews often describe harsh zeros and grade stress.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

, though observations and some tests can feel tricky.

Both formats describe straightforward material; online adds observation verification and reading load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

42/100

as required, and skip-class tags warn you will not pass.

Online often tracks video and Canvas time; in person commonly requires show-up and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students rave about her care and teaching, but a cluster of recent online warnings pulls the recommendation below MustTake.

In-person recommendation is near universal; online is mixed with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Long-term reputation is fair-to-lenient with , but and AI zeros appear often in recent online reviews.

Format shift

In person leans lenient; online and unpredictable.

Workload

Light

72/100

Workload is usually light with discussions, short quizzes, and notes; observations and write-ups are the main heavier pieces.

Format shift

Online adds observation reports and Canvas participation tracking; in person is mostly notes and a few tests.

Teaching experience

Excellent

84/100

Students , and life-changing for CD majors, despite a recent online trust issue.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is dominant; online and AI-policing stress.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of participation, quizzes, short homework, observations, and .

Format shift

Online emphasizes discussions, quizzes, and observation papers; in person emphasizes lectures, notes, and a couple of tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly glowing: and notes lead to easy As for most students.

Main concern

A and ; skipping class hurts because participation and notes drive exams.

What students said

“she's the ”
CD01
“ . accepts late work. dont buy the book... if you are looking for an easy A”
CD1
“If I could I would take her for all of my CD classes. 10/10”
CD002

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

older reviews praise short videos and easy quizzes, while 2022-2025 reviews warn of , and .

Main concern

Frequent AI cheating accusations and tough or work is completed.

What students said

“She's a , so you never know what she's looking for in assignments. She accuses everyone of using AI”
CD11
“her class is easy to succeed in as long as you do the work”
CD01
“Every time I used Google Translate, it would tell me you used AI and give me a zero”
CD11

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

notes; online final observation work is checked with centers.

Lecture-based quizzesTricky but common-sense testsObservation paper with verificationMultiple choice

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

lectures and notes; some call them tricky but still passable with attention.

Midterm and finalLecture-based MCNotes matterExtra credit common
“ and final. ”
CD11
“Tests are so hard. she grades so tough too. Class avg for !!!”
CD

Online

Online quizzes and discussions are mostly straightforward, but the and AI flags can zero work.

Multiple-choice quizzesObservation reportCanvas participation checksAI plagiarism scrutiny
“the ... She will call the center to check if the child you wrote about is actually a student there”
CD01
“She accuses everyone of using AI, which is frustrating and unfair”
CD11

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Snow is THE . You can tell she cares about what she teaches... Take Professor Snow you won't regret it!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (12 online, 38 in person), highlighting teaching care, grade path, and recent online AI conflict. Credibility rating: High.

❤️

84/100

“she's the . She'll respect you if you respect her”

📈 Easy Path If You Show Up

68/100

“ . accepts late work. dont buy the book... if you are looking for an easy A”

⚠️

35/100

“Every time I used Google Translate, it would tell me you used AI and give me a zero”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing professor!
  • Her lectures are amazing, very educational and interesting
  • Shes amazing, she always get you and if you show up

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • class is easy to pass as long as you show up and pay attention
  • Tricky exams but mostly common sense
  • Don't expect an A !!!

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • !!!
  • She is constantly accusing me of using AI
  • majority of the class was very easy with simple discussions and multiple-choice quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

96

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 detailed reviews spanning 2013-2025 with consistent in-person praise and a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 578
4 out of 56
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

CD0114 reviews
CD77 reviews
CD116 reviews
CD14 reviews
CD3 reviews
Show 12 more courses
CD0022 reviews
CD022 reviews
CD02212 reviews
CHD12 reviews
CD0271 review
CD1011 review
CD21 review
CD221 review
CD2CD421 review
CHDEV651 review
CHILDDEV1 review
CHILDDEV21 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

23

A+ 8 · A 15

B range

9

B+ 6 · B 3

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D 1 · D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1