AI Rate Professor

English

Tatyana Surenyan

ENG28 · ENG0000 · ENG21 · ENG102 · ENGLI3204 · ENG101 · ENG103 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHostile Classroom ClimateTough Mood-Based GraderExpensive Self-Published BookMandatory AttendanceLots of Papers
  • Most students describe her as rude, belittling, and sometimes discriminatory in class.
  • and strict due dates.
  • and a costly required book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students get As by turning work in on time, but and mood-based deductions keep an A from being free.

Online comments lean easier for grades; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is basic English composition, but lectures often fail to teach it clearly.

Both formats describe manageable material if ; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and skip-class penalties.

; online evidence is thinner.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

Only a ; most tell students to run.

; a few older online reviews are more positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and .

Format shift

Harsh grading complaints dominate in-person reviews more than online ones.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many papers, frequent essays, reading, and strict deadlines create a heavy writing load.

Format shift

online short-term courses still requiring weekly essays.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe yelling, belittling, off-topic personal talk, and little useful instruction.

Format shift

than a few positive online outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and participation more than high-stakes proctored exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing yelling, , and .

Main concern

Hostile classroom climate and .

What students said

“I never wore my seatbelt while driving to campus because I didn't want to make it to her class.”
ENG101
“Stay away from her please!! Racist, inappropriate with the guys in the class”
ENG101
“ , and however many points she wants based on how she's feeling.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

a few call it an easy A with heavy papers, while others slam the expensive self-published book and poor teaching videos.

Main concern

Unprofessional tone and a costly required book with little useful instruction.

What students said

“Easy A! But she could be unprofessional and mean! I say to stay away, and run!”
ENG101
“She requires you to buy her self published $90. book that is only 100 pages”
ENG28
“Ignore what people have said about this professor! I took her class online this summer and it was perfect!”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and timed essays; .

Essay-heavy assessmentClosed-note essays mentionedQuizzes and testsStrict deadlines

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and closed-note essays with little grading clarity.

Closed-note essaysHard tests and quizzesNo clear rubric
“ . If you're not completely incompetent you'll pass.”
ENG101
“ and quizzes. Lost of papers and graded them very strictly”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews emphasize frequent papers and discussions more than proctored exams; policy details are limited.

Weekly papersDiscussions
“there is a 4-5 page paper due every weekend. Final is a 8-10 page paper...”
ENG102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just save yourself and stay away.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting hostility, grading, and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

😬 Classroom Climate

15/100

“Professor Surenyan is an extremely rude person. She often makes comments to single you out in front of the entire class”

📉 Recommendation Rate

14/100

“Stay far away!”

📝

22/100

“ , and however many points she wants based on how she's feeling.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“Very easy class if you do all the material on time... HW is mainly just a 3/4 pg essay every ~2 weeks.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She thinks shes always right... Like actually.
  • Her lectures consist of 40 minutes of her chatting about her various opinions
  • She only showed a bunch of how to videos.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A! But she could be unprofessional and mean!
  • Class was not super hard but shes picky about random stuff.
  • Do the work, u'll get an A

Theme 3

💔 About Classroom Climate

  • I believe she made a student cry one time too.
  • Racist, inappropriate with the guys in the class
  • if anyone disagreed with what she said

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

39 detailed reviews spanning many years show , and low recommendation.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 526

Course coverage

ENG10123 reviews
ENG286 reviews
ENG1024 reviews
ENG00003 reviews
ENG1031 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG211 review
ENGLI32041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 9

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 1

C range

3

C 3

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1