Elvira Khasanova

MATH240 · MATH115MATH125 · MATH134 · PRECALC25970 · STATS227 · MATH115 · MATH261 · EB1203 · PRECALC260 · MATH227 · MATH260 · MATH228A · STATC1000 · 55 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 58/100
RMP rating: 3.5/5
Take again: 68.52%
Difficulty: 3.1

The decision

Prefer her for stats if you attend and do HW; think twice for precalculus.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized by courseExtra credit heavyLots of homeworkCaring but unevenStats easier than precalc

MATH227/ , and free-A vibes.
MATH260/precalc reviews frequently say lectures confuse and .
, and is common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

Stats can be an easy A with open notes and HW, but precalc and .

Online is mixed; in-person stats skews easier while MATH260 skews hard.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

stats often manageable, precalc and calc tracks feel challenging.

; online includes both easy and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Skip-class-you-will-not-pass messaging and .

and in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

, but precalc students often warn others away.

; older precalc and some online reviews are strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

, and open and tough-grader tags appear often.

Format shift

; some online and precalc reviews call her a .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Lots of homework, weekly quizzes, and .

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Many call her caring and ; a large precalc minority says she cannot teach.

Format shift

Online comments also split between caring clarity and patience problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Quizzes, several midterms, and a .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy; but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and passable with open notes; precalc and some higher math draw harsh teaching critiques.

Main concern

Course-dependent teaching quality and .

What students said

“To me, it felt like one of those free A's class”
MATH227

“She's a very nice professor, however, she does not teach precalculus well”
MATH260

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences range from simple infinite-attempt homework to avoid-at-all-costs complaints about pace and tone.

Main concern

Time management, dragged lectures, and .

What students said

“Her online course is simple, homework assignment every week with infinite attempts and tests”
MATH227

“ . I have taken many math classes at Pierce and Valley and she's by far the ”
MATH240

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Stats exams can be student-friendly with notes and tools, while other .

Open notes on some examsCheat sheet allowed sometimesDesmos/Statkey allowedWeekly quizzesDrop lowest test

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

cheat sheet; precalc exams are described as tricky and mismatched.

Open notesCheat sheetIn-class testsPractice exams

“ , and she allows you to use Desmos, and Statkey on them”
MATH227

“she lets you take a cheat sheet for the ”
MATH227

Online

Online mentions homework-based tests and long Zooms but does .

Homework-aligned testsInfinite HW attemptsZoom lectures

“ and her zooms are very long but she will cut them short sometimes”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“To me, it felt like one of those free A's class.”
Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, separating stats-positive and precalc-negative themes. Credibility rating: High.

📊 Stats-Friendly Side

75/100

“She's literally the only professor I took that it.”

🚫 Precalc Warning

25/100

“STAY AWAY and .”

📝 Workload Reality

34/100

“Other than the insane amount of hw she assigns, she does not accurately go over what will be on the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

but clearly
her lectures make absolutely no sense
She is Amazing !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

, and she allows you to use Desmos
the , and overall difficult to pass
If you do the

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

Very supportive and caring. Wants her students to do well
LOVE HER! She was so sweet and friendly
She's a very nice professor, however, she does not teach precalculus well

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with detailed, polarized but .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 521

4 out of 514

3 out of 56

2 out of 55

1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH22713 reviews

MATH26012 reviews

MATH228A6 reviews

MATH1154 reviews

MATH1344 reviews

Show 8 more courses

MATH2403 reviews

STATS2272 reviews

EB12031 review

MATH115MATH1251 review

MATH2611 review

PRECALC259701 review

PRECALC2601 review

STATC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 3 · A 10 · A- 2

B range

B+ 1 · B 8

C range

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3