AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Stacey Longmore

CD001 · CD42 · CHDEV1 · CD10 · CD11 · CHDEV101 · CD1 · CHDEV001 · 141 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can follow vague instructions carefully and ; many students would choose someone else.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing graderUnclear instructionsUngrading anxietyInteractive when onTough on details
  • Reviews are deeply split between inspiring mentor experiences and harsh complaints about organization, clarity, and tone.
  • Recent , and stress despite doable content.
  • and activity-based, but , and group work still catch many students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Many students can earn A or B with steady work, but picky deductions, vague rubrics, and .

Online stresses ungrading anxiety and ; in-person is more mixed between easy and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is often doable CD material, but reading, projects, and structure.

Online weekly work is moderate; , and group projects.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

Some sections treat attendance as optional online, while and require participation.

Online often lists attendance no; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and care, while the other half urge avoidance over organization and .

; older in-person reviews are more polarized positive versus negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

and picky deductions for tiny mistakes appear often, alongside ungrading methods that students find stressful.

Format shift

Online ungrading draws heavy criticism; .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and tests, not endless busywork, but reading and group work add up.

Format shift

Online usually weekly homework; , and group projects.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Some call her funny, inspiring, and helpful; others call her disorganized, rude, or .

Format shift

Online teaching ratings trend lower recently; in-person has both mentor praise and lecture complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and finals rather than one pure mode.

Format shift

Online emphasizes weekly work plus midterm or final; , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person experiences range from fun interactive mentor classes to , and uneven lectures.

Main concern

Picky grading and content feels interesting.

What students said

“very unorganized. ; .”
CHDEV001
“She is one of the . and not a .”
CD42
“love Love LOVE her. Sit in front. Talk to her when you have the chance.”
CD001

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews lean negative on ungrading, vague instructions, slow feedback, and huge.

Main concern

Ungrading and and grade uncertainty.

What students said

“ so stressful and confusing, and she , so you never knew when you would see your grades.”
CD1
“ weeks straight.”
CHDEV101
“Her instructions on most of her assignments are extremely vague and yet gives unclear instructions.”
CHDEV001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are conventional and can be detailed or hard; reviews .

Midterm short answerFinal multiple choicePop quizzesTest heavyStudy guides sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessments include pop quizzes, multiple-choice tests, group work, and ; clarity of .

Pop quizzesMultiple choice testsGroup projectsStudy guides sometimes
“the and had more questions than the final.”
CHDEV001
“she giives a ton of pop quizes and if you dont pass the whole lot”
CD1
“ and she gives you study guides and answers to them”
CD1

Online

Online comments describe , and conventional midterms or finals without clear proctoring claims.

Weekly assignmentsMidterm short answerFinal multiple choicePicky deductions
“The midterm is 8 questions short answer and the final is 70 questions and is multiple choice with two questions being short answer.”
CD1
“The so study, which is 88 questions.”
CD1
“ .”
CD001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Avoid!!! weeks straight.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (11 online, 39 in and teaching warmth. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

34/100

“ so stressful and confusing, and she ”

📋 Instruction Clarity

30/100

“Instructions are extremely unclear. If you .”

🌟 Mentor Praise

75/100

“I adore Dr. Longmore. She was the perfect professor for me, and .”

👍 Split Recommendation

48/100

“She is one of the . and not a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes so amazing, shes someone you can go to for help and feedback.
  • .
  • She is genuine and her office door is always open!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • because her instructions aren't clear enough sometimes.
  • Be prepared to study A LOT. Be prepared to have to work very hard for an A.
  • This class was easy for me though.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization & Tone

  • She is relentless in submission comments and was rude when I emailed her.
  • sends mass emails to her students telling the class we did not understand the assignment
  • When she gets mad she will snap and talk to you in a very sassy and demeaning way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

141

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide rich but polarized evidence; patterns on clarity and read.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 584
4 out of 515
3 out of 513
2 out of 511
1 out of 518

Course coverage

CD00119 reviews
CD117 reviews
CD425 reviews
CHDEV1013 reviews
CD112 reviews
Show 3 more courses
CHDEV0012 reviews
CD101 review
CHDEV11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 8 · A 15 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1