AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Staceylee Longmore

CD001 · CHDEV1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Prefer her in person if you need a ; if organization and responsiveness matter.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring in personTough grader onlineNot responsive onlineInspirational offlinePop quizzes
  • In-person praise for kindness and willingness to work with students contrasts with weak online organization.
  • Online students , and poor responsiveness.
  • Sample is small and split, so experience seems highly format-dependent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student got B+ and past A/B, but others report , and little late-work mercy.

Online evidence is harsher on grades; in-person shows more support if you engage.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Child development content seems mid-level, with and organization than pure theory.

Online difficulty rises due to disordered notes; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

.

; online also has mandatory flags in one review.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; recommendation rises sharply for in-person mentoring and falls for online.

In-person recommendation is warmer; online reviews advise against.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

and not flexible with late work in person, despite one claim she will work with students.

Format shift

Online is clearly tougher; in-person is more collaborative but still strict on lateness.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reading, quizzes, and group projects appear, without clear evidence of overwhelming weekly volume.

Format shift

Both formats mention standard course work more than extreme load.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Warm, altruistic in-person mentor image clashes with online disorganization and non-responsiveness.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Tests, quizzes, group projects, and limited graded items are all mentioned.

Format shift

Online emphasizes tests and quizzes; and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews split between a glowing mentor-style experience and a complaint about no flexibility on late work.

Main concern

Limited late-work flexibility and pop quizzes.

What students said

“Dr. Longmore is the kindest, most altruistic professor that I have ever had.”
CHDEV1
“Was not flexible with late assignments”
CD001

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and and test prep.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ . .”
CHDEV1
“The and her notes were too which made is so hard to study”
CHDEV1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes and ; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring style.

Quizzes and testsPop quizzesCanvas quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but give little detail on exam format or proctoring.

Pop quizzes
“Beware of pop quizzes”
CD001

Online

Online quizzes and lectures and notes are out of order.

Canvas quizzesTests tied to disordered lectures
“made is so hard to study and get and quizzes.”
CHDEV1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Longmore is the kindest, most altruistic professor that I have ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (2 online, 2 in-person), highlighting format-dependent quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Dr. Longmore is the kindest, most altruistic professor that I have ever had.”

💻 Online Experience

25/100

“ .”

⚖️

30/100

“ . .”

👍 Recommendation Split

50/100

“She will actually work with you out there in her courses, if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • kindest, most altruistic professor
  • will actually work with you

Theme 2

💻 About Online Issues

  • . .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Rules

  • Was not flexible with late assignments
  • Beware of pop quizzes

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with a , though themes within each format are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHDEV13 reviews
CD0011 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values