AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Patrice Doelitzsch

CD0224 · CD42 · CHDEVP036 · CD10 · CD0219 · CD22 · CD11 · CD0237 · CDAD0252 · CHDEVCHDE · CD042 · CHDEV3 · CHDEV1 · SECTION0221 · CD3 · CD45 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want rigorous child development training and will follow instructions closely; skip if you want an easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHigh expectationsClear but strictWriting-heavy CD workPrepares for transferPolarizing style
  • , and caring support.
  • Workload is heavy with papers, observations, and projects; grades must be earned.
  • A vocal .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

if you do every paper and follow directions, but she is often called a .

Both formats stress earned grades; online has less grade-detail evidence.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is clear but assignments are writing-heavy and .

; online also notes many writing tasks.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Multiple reviews say show up, participate, and if .

Online and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, though polarizing toughness lowers universal appeal.

Recent online lean positive; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; tough-grader tags and no appear often.

Format shift

; online mentions severe impact of .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of research, articles, learning plans, and .

Format shift

Both formats report substantial writing; in-person also stresses observations and group work.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and career-prep focused; critics say she confuses directions or talks past questions.

Format shift

In-person has deeper praise and sharper criticism than the smaller online sample.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and participation.

Format shift

Online emphasizes writing plans and articles; in-person adds group activities and tests from notes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

30 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students either love her as a role model who prepares them for CSUN-level work or warn she is a nightmare with petty rules and .

Main concern

High workload, strict grading, and .

What students said

“Follow her and you'll do fine!”
CD10
“her classes are not an easy A class, you have to earn it!”
CD11
“ Nightmare for students .”
CD0224

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Recent online reviews are mostly positive on lectures and and unclear current-event topics.

Main concern

and term.

What students said

“There are lots of writing assignments, but they are manageable.”
CD22
“Its literally almost the end of the semester and she's only graded 4 assignments out of 22.”
CD042

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests reward careful note-taking and .

Tests from lecture notesStraightforward if you studyWriting-heavy assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lectures if you attend and study.

Notes-based testsFair if preparedNo easy free pass
“everything that is on the ”
CD10
“ wants and you will pass with at least a B.”
CHDEV3

Online

Online reviews ; assessment leans to writing and graded submissions.

Writing assignmentsClear grading criteria
“Professor Doelitzsch makes sure you can write great learning plans”
CD22

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Work hard in her class and you'll be rewarded for your efforts.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 Child Development reviews, balancing strong advocates and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is so educated and you can learn a lot from her.”

⚖️

48/100

“Dont expect an A in this class if you dont do the work, she gives you what you deserve!”

📚 Workload

42/100

“lot of research, article and home work. each on really take most of your time for !”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“If this is your field her class is a must.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she's amazing at what she does
  • She keeps things simple and tells you exactly what she needs from you.
  • She is unprepared and didn't interest me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • her classes are not an easy A class, you have to earn it!
  • Do all of your work and you'll get an A.
  • She's a

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • I think of Professor Doelitzsch as the perfect role model.
  • VERY DEDICATED TO THE STUDENTS!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews over many years show a stable split between dedicated fans and harsh critics, with enough detail for medium-high confidence.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CD105 reviews
CD114 reviews
CD34 reviews
CD0423 reviews
CD02242 reviews
Show 14 more courses
CD222 reviews
CD422 reviews
02191 review
02731 review
110911 review
CD02191 review
CD02371 review
CD451 review
CDAD02521 review
CHDEV11 review
CHDEV31 review
CHDEVCHDE1 review
CHDEVP0361 review
SECTION02211 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1