AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Kevin Moniz

MATH · MATH240 · TRIG240 · MATH112 · MATH125 · MATH127 · MATH125P3296 · MAH125 · ALGEB125 · STAT · MAT125 · MATH110 · MATH125P3293 · MATH227 · MATH260 · 89 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
63.33%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend every class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTest-heavy gradingOptional ungraded homeworkHilarious but intensePolarizing personalityAttendance matters
  • Grades hinge on a ; .
  • , and truly wants you to pass.
  • Critics say lectures ramble, questions feel unsafe, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

A is possible with strong study and attendance, but and As.

; online also stresses difficult exams with little graded HW.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Math content moves fast, tests concepts deeply, and many report needing heavy outside study.

Both formats describe challenging math; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

; he notices absences and participation.

In-person evidence is strong; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 63 percent would take again, but reviews are sharply split between life-changing and avoid-at-all-costs.

In-person drives the split; online leans more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

a strong final; other times marks work harshly on scantrons.

Format shift

and tough work checks; online is mostly tough.

Workload

Light

62/100

, so busywork is low, but real study load for .

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and humor for some; tangents, intimidation, and poor scaffolding for others.

Format shift

In-person has both extremes; online notes rambling and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

A handful of tests and a ; .

Format shift

Consistent across formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

many call him the best math teacher they had, others say arrogant, fast, and unhelpful with .

Main concern

Ego, fast pace, and few graded chances make recovery difficult after a .

What students said

“ and is there to help you with any questions.”
MATH127
“he knows the material, he just doesn't know how to teach it.”
MATH260
“The majority of the class failed the tests”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some caring structure, but , and .

Main concern

success hard without strong self-study.

What students said

“Mr. Moniz also rambles a lot, so some self studying will be required in his online class.”
MATH125
“there is not HW in his class. He won't grade HW and and exams”
MATH260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high stakes and concept-focused; friendliness is limited despite occasional notes or curves.

Test heavyFew exam chancesWork shown requiredOptional note page sometimes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

shown work beyond scantron answers.

Few testsShow workDrop lowest sometimesNot multiple choice final
“you only get 4 tests (4 chances) to make the grade.”
MATH227
“ because work wasnt shown on a problem.”
MATH240

Online

and difficult exams with .

Quizzes and exams onlyDifficult tests
“ and exams which are difficult because he does not provide any type of or notes.”
MATH260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and there are only three tests and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews, capturing the strong love-hate split around sparse high-stakes testing. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Nobody ever explain math to me so well.”

📝 Test Pressure

35/100

“you only get 4 tests (4 chances) to make the grade.”

😄 Personality Split

50/100

“He's pretty hilarious and I know participation matters in this class”

🚫

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are fast and at times hard to decipher.
  • He goes off on awful tangents that .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do garbage on the the final and he'll give you an A
  • No graded HW (DO THE .
  • he makes things unnecessarily difficult.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Actual Homie
  • makes you feel stupid when you do.
  • he's caring, as in he wants you to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

89

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with long time span and highly polarized but .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 530
4 out of 515
3 out of 56
2 out of 519
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH24011 reviews
MATH12510 reviews
MATH2279 reviews
MATH2603 reviews
ALGEB1252 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH2 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
STAT2 reviews
32931 review
MAH1251 review
MAT1251 review
MATH125P32931 review
MATH125P32961 review
MATH1271 review
TRIG2401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 9 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 2 · C 4

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 3