AI Rate Professor

Theatre Dance

Brian Moe

DANCE1013305 · DANCEST801 · DANCETQ121 · DANCEST805 · DANCETQ141 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him for technique if you will practice and participate; if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardKind and funny technique coachFair grading if you tryHeavy group papers in survey coursesParticipation and practice matterPolarized on beginners
  • and fair when students practice and ask questions.
  • Survey and online history-style , and .
  • Serious dancers praise technique growth; casual beginners sometimes feel dismissed or bored.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students report A or A+ if they practice and participate, but and group work can still cost grades for less engaged students.

; in-person reviews emphasize effort and participation for fair grades.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Studio technique is manageable with outside practice, while and writing that raise the challenge.

In-person technique reads easier than online DANCEST805 paper load.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and stress participation, with skip-class warnings on some technique sections.

; one online summer section reported more support flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

while survey and beginner-casual students often would not.

; one of two online reviews is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Students say he grades fairly when you try, and several still earned A or A+ .

Format shift

In-person fair-grading praise is stronger than online group-grade frustration.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Technique needs outside practice; online and some , and reading.

Format shift

Online five-week DANCEST805 is described as paper- and group-heavy compared with studio sections.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Praise for kindness, energy, and technique coaching sits beside complaints about boring sessions, bad music choices, and dismissive answers.

Format shift

In-person studio praise is louder; online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment centers on participation, practice, group work, papers, and .

Format shift

Online stresses papers and group projects; and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person technique and studio classes range from beloved step-by-step coaching to , and harsh vibes for beginners.

Main concern

Attendance and participation matter, and some beginners feel talked down to.

What students said

“Grades FAIRLY. I have taken this class which is Jazz, Modern 801 and Modern Tq 141, all easy as long as you try and put in effort.”
DANCETQ121
“Great professor for learning technique and for serious dancers but not for beginner and casual dancers.”
DANCEST801
“Professor Moe is one of the . He guides you step by step.”
DANCE1013305

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online DANCEST805 is polarizing: one student felt supported in summer history of dance, and papers stressful.

Main concern

Heavy group dependence and .

What students said

“ALOT of unnecessary group projects and hard for a 5 week course.”
DANCEST805
“with Brian's constant support and kindness, I was able to learn so much about the history of dance”
DANCEST805

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes, papers, and participation more than formal high-stakes exams, with .

Pop quizzesParticipation-based gradingResearch papersGroup projects

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation more than closed-book finals; exam proctoring is not clearly described.

Pop quizzesParticipation mattersGroup projects
“ .”
DANCEST801
“Beware of pop quizzes”
DANCEST801

Online

Online comments focus on essays, research papers, and .

Research papersGroup projectsReading load
“ALOT of unnecessary group projects and hard for a 5 week course.”
DANCEST805

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and correlates a dance movement/ technique to the movement of the body. Grades FAIRLY.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews across online and and beginner concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Professor Moe is one of the . He guides you step by step.”

📈 Effort Versus Reward

68/100

“all easy as long as you try and put in effort. Practice outside of class.”

⚠️ Survey Course Workload

40/100

“ALOT of unnecessary group projects and hard for a 5 week course.”

👥 Beginner Fit

45/100

“Great professor for learning technique and for serious dancers but not for beginner and casual dancers.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He guides you step by step.
  • He is full of energy. His dance choreography is awesome.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Grades FAIRLY
  • super
  • It didnt effect my grade at all.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit and Climate

  • DON'T BE SCARED TO ASK QUESTIONS
  • when you ask a question he will answer it in a way that makes you feel stupid
  • Thought Dance 801, was gonna be fun but it was just boring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews span 2017-2026 with mixed tones and course types, so patterns are usable but split by format and class type.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DANCEST8013 reviews
DANCEST8053 reviews
DANCE10133051 review
DANCETQ1211 review
DANCETQ1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1