AI Rate Professor

History

Laura Carlone-Mooslin

HISTORY002 · HISTORY001 · HISTORY11089 · HIS007 · HIST86 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
36.84%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you write strongly, follow rubrics closely, and and mandatory lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderLecture HeavyAI Detection IssuesLots of WritingPolarizing
  • Passionate lectures for some, soulless and biased for others
  • Heavy writing, strict deadlines, and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

and clear rubrics help some, but and AI deductions make an A hard work.

Online has more AI-penalty horror stories; in-person stresses missed lectures and tough papers.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Lots of , and test-heavy tags keep content demanding.

Both formats report high difficulty; online often rates 4-5.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and missing lectures hurts.

In-person is especially strict; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

About 37% would take again; praise for .

Older online reviews more positive; recent online and in-person more negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader tags dominate; AI software and .

Format shift

Online students report more AI-related grade cuts.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and multi-hour big assignments appear often.

Format shift

Some recent in-person sections claim only one short weekly assignment.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Passion and ; rude, disorganized, or biased lectures for others.

Format shift

Online polarity is strongest; and uneven.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of weekly assignments, essays, written exams, movie reports, and finals.

Format shift

Online mentions essay exams and 7-page final; and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students note mandatory , and some praise for clear weekly assignments and feedback.

Main concern

Miss a lecture and you fall behind; .

What students said

“I would .”
HISTORY002
“If you miss a lecture you're done for.”
HISTORY001
“Overall solid class, just do your assignments and submit on time.”
HISTORY001

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews swing from wonderful feedback and docking grades and heavy writing.

Main concern

AI content flags and heavy writing with .

What students said

“ .”
HISTORY001
“She is a wonderful Professor! Her passion really shows and it really makes the class enjoyable.”
HIS007
“ . stay away.”
HISTORY001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and large papers are common; reviews .

Essay ExamsWritten Final PaperNo Late WorkLecture-Based Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

papers, and lecture dependence; closed-book is not fully proven.

In-Person TestsFinal PaperNo Cheat Sheets
“There are a use cheat sheets) & there's a .”
HISTORY002
“If you miss a lecture you're done for.”
HISTORY001

Online

Online students mention essay exams given early, multi-page finals, and heavy .

Essay Question Exams7-Page Final PaperHeavy Writing
“ because her final was a 7-page paper.”
HISTORY002
“ and are given one week prior.”
HISTORY001

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews across online and and grading risk. Credibility rating: High.

🔥 Polarizing Teaching

48/100

“One of the .”

🤖

28/100

“She reduced my grades do to AI content, so I streamed my work and the lack of AI content.”

✍️ Writing Heavy

30/100

“be prepared for .”

❤️ Passion When It Clicks

70/100

“She is a wonderful Professor! Her passion really shows and it really makes the class enjoyable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and she's constantly questioning why she didn't fix certain PowerPoint slides.
  • She has a lively personality and is good at grabbing your attention.
  • Professor Carlone-Mooslin is the best! Shes so passionate about history.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No matter how much you studied there is no guarantee that you succeed on it.
  • This class could be an easy A if you follow the rubrics & communicate.

Theme 3

⚠️ About AI & Fairness

  • ; no clear rubric.
  • actual AI users never get caught.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

19 detailed reviews across years with mixed but , and lectures.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

HISTORY0019 reviews
HISTORY0025 reviews
HIS0072 reviews
HIST862 reviews
HISTORY110891 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 2

B range

6

B+ 1 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2