AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Alexander Bojkov

MATH240 · 228A · MATH227 · STATS227 · MATH260 · MATH120 · MATH110 · MATH238 · MATH134 · MATH125 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
76.67%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you show up, do MyMathLab/Wiley work, and grind the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStudy guides match examsLecture heavyOnline homework heavyFunny and caringAttendance matters
  • Study guides , so consistent students can earn high grades.
  • Lectures can feel boring or fast, especially in compressed terms, but and caring.
  • Attendance and ; skipping is a common failure path.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many call it easy A if you complete study guides and homework, but .

Thin online sample is mostly easy pass; in-person opinions split by student preparation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard college math/stats; difficulty rises with pace and .

Online summer trig felt easy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Skip class and you will not pass is a recurring tag; .

Almost all evidence is in-person mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

About 77 percent would take again; praise for study guides and care outweighs fast-pace complaints.

; online sample is small but positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

, and exams mirror study guides without being free.

Format shift

Consistent across formats where mentioned.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of online homework, long study guides (often ~90 questions), and frequent tests.

Format shift

; online also assigns heavy practice.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

, and caring; minority say boring, fast, or hard to understand.

Format shift

In-person has rich mixed detail; online notes boring but not bad teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple midterms plus final and study guides.

Format shift

Both formats center Pearson/MyMathLab or Wiley practice into tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and exams pulled straight from study guides.

Main concern

Pace can overwhelm weaker math students, especially summer or night sections.

What students said

“EASIEST A YOU CAN GET. AND FEW WRITTEN PORTION QUES”
MATH227
“The only way you fail this class is by not showing up.”
MATH125
“He teaches really fast and everything all at once so it gets so overwhelming.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Limited online evidence points to manageable MyMathLab/Pearson work and .

Main concern

Lectures can still feel boring and stats online is harder for some students.

What students said

“Really easy class! Although the lectures can get boring, he's not bad at teaching.”
MATH240
“Gives a lot of , but and how he grades”
MATH125

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are predictable if you finish study guides, but .

Study guides match examsIn-person closed notes commonOnline platform testsDrops lowest exam

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and drawn directly from long study guides; some older reviews required memorizing formulas.

Study guides equal testsNo notes on some testsDrops lowest test
“ and no notes so make sure you pay attention in class and complete online hw.”
MATH134
“THE .”
MATH227

Online

and tests that are straightforward to pass.

MyMathLab/Pearson testsClear grading criteria
“For us all the assignments and , so it was very easy to pass.”
MATH240

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE . HE TAKES ABOUT 40 QUESTION FROM 90 QUESTION AND .”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews (2 online, 37 in , and pace. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Hes a GREAT professor. His lectures are fantastic and .”

📘

80/100

“Study guide is EXACTLY like the test so ask a lot of questions and make sure all the problems are solved correctly.”

⏱️ Pace Concerns

40/100

“He teaches really fast and everything all at once so it gets so overwhelming.”

👍 Recommendation

76/100

“i would 100% recommend him to .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very thorough during lectures
  • funny and
  • lectures were also super boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASIEST A YOU CAN GET
  • problems
  • This class is so hard

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework
  • There is a lot of and a lot of study guide questions
  • and the $100 access code is required

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

39 reviews spanning many years with repeated , and mixed pace complaints.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 512
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH22714 reviews
MATH12510 reviews
228A4 reviews
MATH1343 reviews
MATH2402 reviews
Show 5 more courses
STATS2272 reviews
MATH1101 review
MATH1201 review
MATH2381 review
MATH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 15

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1