AI Rate Professor

Art amp Architecture

Ramela Abbamontian

ART10212233FA23 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Fine for an easy online A if you only need credit, not for deep art-history teaching.

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy quizzesKhan Academy heavyResponsive emailsExtra creditLow teaching presence
  • Both reviewers found the online art history class easy with high grades.
  • One praises structure and responsiveness; the other says it is only Khan Academy.
  • Little evidence of deep instructor-led teaching or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

85/100

Both students earned A or A+ with easy quizzes and light structure, so an A looks low-effort.

All evidence is from two online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Reading, easy quizzes, and unit reviews keep content simple with low reported difficulty.

Online-only sample of two reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

and one says no, so flexibility is unclear online.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

while the other says it is not worth money for real art-history teaching.

Split 50-50 online opinions with no in-person data.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and both students reporting A or A+ .

Format shift

Online-only evidence.

Workload

Light

78/100

Reading plus easy quizzes and a few unit reviews with no textbook required.

Format shift

Both online reviews describe a light load.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and responsive; the other says she only assigns Khan Academy with .

Format shift

Polarized online teaching views with tiny sample.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Assessment centers on reading, quizzes, and unit reviews rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online structure only; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online art history with , and heavy reliance on Khan Academy.

Main concern

Minimal original instruction and .

What students said

“Her class was easy to follow; you need to read, easy quizzes, 3 unit reviews that are easy”
ART10212233FA23
“Only uses Khan Academy and as a class”
ART10212233FA23

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course uses easy quizzes and unit reviews with no reported strict proctoring.

Easy quizzesUnit reviewsExtra creditKhan Academy modules

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Reviews describe easy quizzes and unit reviews without webcam or Lockdown Browser claims.

Easy quizzesUnit reviewsExtra credit
“easy quizzes, 3 unit reviews that are easy”
ART10212233FA23
“Only uses Khan Academy and as a class”
ART10212233FA23

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Only uses Khan Academy and as a class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 online reviews with split praise versus Khan-Academy-only critique. Credibility rating: Low.

✅ Easy Grades

85/100

“easy quizzes, 3 unit reviews that are easy”

📺 Low Teaching Presence

40/100

“Only uses Khan Academy and as a class”

👍 Split Recommendation

50/100

“ ”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy quizzes, 3 unit reviews that are easy
  • despite being easy as a class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's an amazing person, easy to talk to, and
  • If you are looking for and knowledge on Art History, this is not the one for you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 online reviews from 2023-2024 conflict sharply on teaching value despite agreeing the class is easy.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART10212233FA232 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values