AI Rate Professor

Computer Science-C.S.I.T.

Douglas Allen

ENGINEERING · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

if you want a low-stress engineering exposure class and a free A for showing up and submitting work.

Best fit · Easy A HunterHilariousCaringParticipation gradesEasiest ANo perfection needed
  • Grades mainly on participation and completion, not perfection.
  • Very low difficulty; A/A+ reported with minimal stress.
  • Funny, chill part-time vibe; lectures optional or sparse.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

95/100

Students say just complete work and participation for an A; he does not grade perfection.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

92/100

Course is framed as exposure to engineering tools with difficulty rated at 1 and sparse meetings.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

and meetings often did not happen; lectures felt skippable.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

and call him cool, funny, and an easy A.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Grades on participation and completion; does not check work for perfection.

Format shift

.

Workload

Featherlight

92/100

Follow modules, tinker with CAD tools, and submit work without heavy perfection pressure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students love his humor, care, and chill approach even if lectures are light.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment centers on participation and completed .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person engineering intro feels like an easy participation class with funny lectures and .

Main concern

Very light structure may not prepare you for harder engineering courses.

What students said

“Just do the work and you will receive an A.”
Engineering
“Easiest A you can possibly have,Just follow the modules and play around with Fusion 360 AutoCad.”
Engineering

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize participation and submitted work, not strict closed exams.

Participation basedCompletion over perfectionNo heavy exam pressure mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; success is framed as doing the work and participating.

Participation basedCompletion checkedLight lecture load
“he checks to see that you did it so don't worry about being perfect.”
Engineering
“most of the times we didnt even had a class meeting.”
Engineering

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just do the work and you will receive an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting easy A grading and chill teaching. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He is a really cool dude.”

🅰️ Easy A Path

95/100

“Easiest A you can possibly have,Just follow the modules and play around with Fusion 360 AutoCad.”

😂 Humor & Care

92/100

“And he is funny!!! not your ordinary profesore.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He was more focused on just exposing you to the engineering world
  • his lectures were peretty much a yap fest so you dont even have to go to them
  • He is a really cool dude.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just do the work and you will receive an A.
  • grades based on participation
  • he does not check your work, he checks to see that you did it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

and detailed, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

Engineering2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values