AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Naomi Fried-Kokason

MATH15442 · GEO675 · MATH240 · STAT227 · STATS227 · MATH227 · 74699HVH · GEO101 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and handle a fast, test-heavy class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast PowerPoint lecturesTest-heavy statsTough graderRude when asked questionsSelf-study required
  • Many students say and does not truly teach concepts
  • Tests and and
  • A strong effort

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few strong students earn As or Bs, but many report Cs, incompletes, drops, and As.

Online and ; online adds expensive calculator and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Fast lectures, limited examples, and cumulative or catalog suggests.

Both formats call pace too fast; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tied to credit or skip-class warnings.

True across online and in-person; but is not the pattern.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

and the majority of comments say .

Online is nearly all avoid; defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

Tough grader tags dominate, with and .

Format shift

; and weak-curve complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and homework that still demands time even when only.

Format shift

Online stresses quizzes and expensive tools; and weekly chapter quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most students say she races through slides, answers rudely, and .

Format shift

Negative teaching complaints appear in both formats; a if they already self-study well.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments center on tests, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

Both formats are test heavy; online notes most tests .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews mostly describe PowerPoint , and a cold classroom tone, with a few hardcore learners defending her.

Main concern

Students feel dumb asking questions and must re-teach themselves after class.

What students said

“SHE DOESNT EVEN TEACH AND GIVES TOO MUCH WORK”
GEO101
“She does not TEACH. She reads from a and then hands out an activity.”
MATH227
“If you put in the time like doing your hw after a lecture or just study you will do great in this class.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online and Zoom sections are widely panned for blistering pace, rude answers, expensive materials, and .

Main concern

Fast lectures plus unhelpful answers force peer teaching and .

What students said

“she would go wayyyy to fast on lectures.”
MATH227
“you likely wont get through this class without help.”
MATH227
“She goes fast through the lecture and she didnt care you didnt understand.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , and almost no second chances.

Test heavyMultiple choice testsWeekly chapter quizzesCumulative finalNo retakes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person sections use multiple exams, weekly quizzes, multiple-choice tests, and a .

4 exams and a finalWeekly chapter quizMultiple choiceNo retakes
“There is a ... a total of 4 exams and a final.”
MATH227
“ ”
GEO101

Online

Online students describe hard mostly-online tests and quizzes after very fast lectures.

Hard online testsMany quizzesAttendance tracked
“ but most online.”
MATH227
“A lots of quizzes and assessment”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dont even bother taking her class. She teaches way to fast and unclear.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews, highlighting pace, exams, and support gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She does not TEACH. She reads from a and then hands out an activity.”

📉 Recommendation

30/100

“ !! doesnt really curve & class is painful to sit through.”

🧪

32/100

“The highest grade the class got for test #2 and #3 was a C (70%).”

💬 Classroom Tone

20/100

“When you ask for help she will make you feel dumb for asking.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • flies thru PPTs, which makes it hard to learn
  • She doesn't know how to teach
  • you likely wont get through this class without help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Crazy amounts of teach
  • and gives them 0's
  • If you put in the time ... you will do great in this class.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • she answers but in a rude way
  • to ask anything
  • She literally told the class she does not respect us

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews are moderately detailed and consistently negative on teaching pace and tests, though a few strong positives create some variance.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 54
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH22711 reviews
STATS2273 reviews
74699HVH2 reviews
GEO1012 reviews
MATH154422 reviews
Show 3 more courses
STAT2272 reviews
GEO6751 review
MATH2401 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

6

C 4 · C- 2

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2