AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shuba Simhan

MATH112 · MATH228B · MATH115 · MATH105 · MATH110 · MATH228 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 26 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if you have another stats or math option; only take her if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderTest HeavyLots of HomeworkHard to UnderstandSelf-Teach Risk
  • Many students say and poorly aligned with class.
  • Accent, fast pace, and defensive responses make lectures for many.
  • A and workable if and use tutoring.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tough grading, time-pressured tests, and reliability.

Online reviews are especially harsh; a .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast lectures, confusing wording, and than it should.

Both formats describe difficulty, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while others mark it optional or not provided, so policy is inconsistent.

Online reviews lean mandatory; in-person reports mix mandatory and optional.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and most recent detailed comments urge students to choose another professor.

Both online reviews advise against her; of fans.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Tough grader tags dominate; partial-credit rules and .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and test-heavy pacing appear often.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears across both formats.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many students say she is nice personally but hard to understand, fast, and weak at explaining or answering questions.

Format shift

Online reviews are almost entirely negative; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tests, quizzes, and time pressure .

Format shift

; online also stresses quiz and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Most in-person , and hard-to-follow lectures, with a smaller group finding her fair if you work hard.

Main concern

Timed tests and .

What students said

“The because she doesnt give us enough time to finish it.”
MATH227
“the class.”
MATH228
“If you are planning to take this class be ready to tech yourself in order to pass.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are , and fast lectures.

Main concern

Hard to understand and discourages questions while still expecting heavy involvement.

What students said

“The professor is by far the . and when she grades her comments are just as confusing.”
MATH228
“this professor gets upset when you ask questions, and then complains that no one asks questions or is involved.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as long, timed, tricky, and poorly aligned with teaching, with rare open-notes relief.

Timed ExamsTest HeavyPop QuizzesOpen Notes SometimesTricky Wording

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

questions, tricky items, and occasional open notes.

Timed Exams16+ Questions in One HourOpen Notes Allowed SometimesPop Quizzes
“She provided 16+ questions.”
MATH227
“Open notes allowed for tests. but she .”
MATH228
“The because she doesnt give us enough time to finish it.”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam or lockdown tools, but grading and .

Confusing Exam FeedbackTough Grader
“when she grades her comments are just as confusing.”
MATH228
“she goes fast with the lectures so its really difficult to keep up.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 26 reviews, , and teaching clarity issues. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

30/100

“Shes nice, but this lady does not know how to teach.”

📉 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📝

32/100

“She provided 16+ questions.”

📚 Workload

24/100

“Yeah she gives you a lot of homework but in math it's expected.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her accent is difficult to understand
  • she moves way too fast

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The because she doesnt give us enough time
  • class

Theme 3

💔 About Student Experience

  • be ready to tech yourself in order to pass
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

26

Recent reviews read by the AI

26

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-six reviews spanning many years and courses give a large, mostly consistent negative signal with a documented minority of positive outliers.

Inside 26 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH2278 reviews
MATH1255 reviews
MATH1153 reviews
MATH2283 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH2622 reviews
MATH1051 review
MATH1101 review
MATH228B1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1