AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Stacy Longmore

CHDEV1 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLots of HomeworkTest HeavyPassive AggressiveUnclear Directions
  • Students strongly warn against taking her for CHDEV1 due to tough grading and .
  • and can be assigned over breaks.
  • She can care about students yet embarrass or give attitude when questioned.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

, and incomplete or audit outcomes show an A is extremely hard to earn.

Both online and ; no evidence of easy A paths.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and introductory.

Online and and heavy work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Two of , so flexibility is low.

Online and one in-person review say mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Every .

Online and in-person comments unanimously advise avoiding her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tagged tough grader with undergrading and .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Lots of , and assignments even during break.

Format shift

and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students call her a horrible professor with and poor classroom demeanor.

Format shift

Online stresses no direction; in-person stresses attitude and public embarrassment.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tags and and test-heavy structure over easy assignment cushion.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, passive aggression, and risk of public embarrassment if you get on her bad side.

Main concern

and harsh classroom attitude make the experience stressful.

What students said

“ . Seriously save yourself the headache.”
CHDEV1
“ !!! She's a professor that gives a lot of attitude when you ask her a questions.”
CHDEV1

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online student calls her a lovely person but a horrible professor who undergrades and .

Main concern

and aggressive undergrading.

What students said

“ ! She's a lovely person but a HORRIBLE professor.”
CHDEV1

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as very hard with no student-friendly cues like open book or take-home.

Hard TestsTest HeavyTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and the class is test heavy.

Hard TestsTest Heavy
“ !!!”
CHDEV1

Online

Online review does not describe exam format .

Tough Grader
“Her "undergrading method" (look it up) is the stupidest thing ever and .”
CHDEV1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! She's a lovely person but a HORRIBLE professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫

8/100

“ . Seriously save yourself the headache.”

📝

22/100

“ .”

🧪

28/100

“ !!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a lovely person but a HORRIBLE professor.
  • .
  • gives a lot of attitude when you ask her a questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!!
  • Lots of homework

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews from 2018-2023, all negative and consistent, but sample size is small.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHDEV13 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1