AI Rate Professor

American Sign Language

Stephanie Zornoza

ASL002 · ASL001 · ASL220594 · ASL1 · ASL01 · ASL2 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
86.96%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want to truly learn ASL and will practice constantly; do not expect an easy free A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringHilariousParticipation mattersInspirationalSkip class? You won't pass
  • Students overwhelmingly call her one of and .
  • Success requires daily practice, videos, and .
  • A minority online and and support uneven for struggling students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic if you practice daily and participate fully, but language volume and .

work; online more often reports harsh grading and B-range outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

, yet hours of practice make the course moderately demanding.

Both formats call language learning hard but ; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

that skipping class means you will not pass.

online or blank exceptions.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Roughly 87% would take her again and many call her the .

In-person enthusiasm is near-universal; online is still mostly positive with two sharp low scores.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and , but and harsh video scoring appear often enough.

Format shift

; in-person more often rewards effort.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Expect video , and sometimes deaf events plus a required book.

Format shift

Online explicitly flags lots of homework and no late work; in-person stresses practice and participation.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly praise patient, funny, organized teaching that actually produces ASL skill.

Format shift

Excellence is strongest in person; online still rates .

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and tests rather than one pure exam track.

Format shift

Online leans assignment- and video-heavy; in-person balances practice, participation, and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

humor, patience, and real skill gains when students practice.

Main concern

Attendance and participation are effectively required, and shy students must perform in front of class.

What students said

“LITERALLY THE !”
ASL220594
“She makes ASL easy and understandable. Takes her time if the class doesn't understand”
ASL2
“If you put the work in it definitely is an easy A”
ASL001

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online ASL still gets strong teaching praise, but and .

Main concern

No late work, video uploads, and .

What students said

“CHAMP teacher right here!!! Stephanie is so kind and super brilliant”
ASL001
“she does not accept late work.some weeks were hw heavy but rather easy to get through”
ASL001
“She's an you if you're not perfect at ASL right away”
ASL001

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment relies on signing videos, in-class performance, and .

Video tests and assignmentsParticipation-heavy assessmentPractice modules and study videosNo strong proctoring claims

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment centers on participation, practice dialogues, video assignments, and .

In-class signing practiceVideo assignmentsParticipation matters
“ , but they're simple enough and gives us enough time to practice in class”
ASL1
“The only struggle was the ”
ASL01

Online

Online students , and strict late policy rather than proctored written exams.

Upload videos to classmates and professorHomework-heavy weeksNo late work
“you'll need to upload serval videos to classmates and directly to her.she does not accept late work”
ASL001
“gives very poor grades and she is not a good listener”
ASL002

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“LITERALLY THE ! ... !”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 ASL reviews across online and , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“She is a deaf professor who has a lot of patient for her students. She makes ASL easy and understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“ . and the work is not bad.”

⏱️ Workload Reality

42/100

“If your not ready to devote so many hours of studying, and so much hw, then I suggest finding another class.”

⚖️

55/100

“She's an you if you're not perfect at ASL right away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • always has a smile on her face and very helpful
  • used games & acted things out to teach the signs
  • and funny

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put the work in it definitely is an easy A
  • learning a new language can be difficult so be sure to practice

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • safe and fun environment. !!!!!
  • I LOVE HER!!!!!!!!!!!!! SHES THE !!!!
  • Super nice teacher. Really sweet professor and overall hilarious

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews over multiple years and ASL levels show strong thematic consistency despite a few polarized low scores.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASL00110 reviews
ASL15 reviews
ASL0023 reviews
ASL23 reviews
ASL011 review
Show 1 more courses
ASL2205941 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 2 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2